Jump to content

User talk:UtherSRG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yojimbo501 (talk | contribs) at 19:19, 20 July 2008 (→‎Thank you: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

zOMG

zOMG
I, Hojimachong, hereby award UtherSRG A completely gratuitous zOMG barnstar, for being 110% awesome. Plus 1. --Hojimachongtalk

collaboration -to start the ball rolling

Homo erectus

I'm glad you watch over the paleoanthropology articles. You catch a lot of vandalism. Earlier today you reverted the insertion of "not" in the paragraph about the use of controlled fire. If one looks at the context, it doesn't really make sense without the word "not." Seems like it should be there. TimidGuy (talk) 14:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Ok. - UtherSRG (talk) 05:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested

Hello again. Sorry for pestering you, but I wanted to again solicit your opinion. I created an ultra-top-level animal template {{Life on Earth}}. I was unsure of a few things, such as the organization and terms used, and if such a template was even a good idea. I was leery of implementing it without some feedback first. Your input would be appreciated. Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, but I know little outside of zoology. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:26, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are online, I requested this page be deleted to make way for a page move per MSW3 and I was hoping you could check it out. If you are not online, then I am utterly disgusted with the world. Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 15:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, taken care of. ;) --Tombstone (talk) 16:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*LOL* I'm online often, but not 24/7. ;) I'm glad you got it taken care of. - UtherSRG (talk) 07:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for helping the Nepal Gray Lampur article, but I take it from your edits that Super family and sub family taxation aren't needed? Or is that incorrect taxation? Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]