User talk:David873

Notice to all editors: This talk page is not for soapboxing or other content that is contrary to Wikipedia user talk page guidelines. Unless disallowed by Wikipedia policy, this talk page may be blanked at any time without warning by the user of this page. David873 (talk) 13:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment

The thing is, the (in my opinion) mostly ignorant and profane comments of the anon IP undermine his/her credibility without any need to remove such comments (which will be removed by an admin if they get any worse). Just be lucky the anon is not making changes to the actual article, because it seems clear from his/her admittedly numerous and voluminous comments that s/he has not even read the basic articles at Wikipedia about this subject. Badagnani (talk) 01:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

accusation of sockpuppetry

i demand an ip trace of my accused sockpuppet immedietly, i did not make any edits to sharon stone as the sockpuppet i am accused of being did, and i most certainly did not touch the cantonese article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.248.199 (talk) 02:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cantonese

look i know alot of people are pissed off over people claiming cantonese are not chinese, and i just remembered sharon stone saying something about the earthquake thingy, but i am most certainl not interested a female actors comments about my people, people make them every day, im more concerned about factual misrepresentasions of chinese, i would never edit the sharon stone talk page, i have not looked at the cantonese talk page, but i would certainly have gotten pissed off at what was wriiten there now that i have seen it. and also its rude to accuse anonymous ip addresses of being sockpuppets, you cant help it because i dont have a static ip, and it changes every single day, anyway, i still do not admit i was that acount, i thouched neither the sharon stone or cantonese articles, or anything related to them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.248.199 (talk) 02:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i demand an apology, i have proof that i am not who you accuse me of being

go to http://www.ip-adress.com/ipaddresstolocation/ and then trace both ips, im am most certainly not in hong kong.

its not wise to jump to conclusions and your accusation was extremely rude. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.248.199 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your location

also since im giving away my location in that website and internet service provider just to prove my innocence even though i dont need to, since my ip will change any way when i switch the internet on and off, i demand your location and internet service provider. using an anonymous ip isnt so anonymous

anti vietman

i an not anti vietnamese, i did not say any racial slurs or anything againts vietnamese in my edits. all i said was that vietnamese claim descent form Shennong, which is true, see his article and that was the likely reason they had DNA more similar to cantonese people than cantonese had to northern chinese, because many altaic peoples, like the mongols, turks, and manchus invaded and mixed with the northern chinese, so the northerners were the fake chinese, and some claim the cantonese language is more similar to vietnamese so they are not chinese, its the other way around, vietnamese has lots of CHINESE loanwords from Middle Chinese, which cantonese is more similar to than mandarin, because mandarin was influenced by the altaic languages. see Sino-Vietnamese vocabulary for proof. everything i said can be proved in the wikipedia articles ive mentioned, what is said was not racial hatred to vietnamese people, unlike what the cantonese guy in hong kong might have done. and im the ip in the USA. its just that some westerners asume things have stayed in the same place in china for the past 2,000 years, they think the cantonese were in the hong kong area for the past 2,000 years, which would be impossible if you look at migration patterns, the cantonese and vietnamese, and other southern chinese were the ones who originally came north, and its actually the northern chinese who came from further north and are the fake ones. nothing i said was racist, or was vandalism.