Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 August 16
Lua error: Invalid |ns=, please use "Article" or a namespace name listed at Wikipedia:Namespaces (excluding special namespaces).
UNDELETE_REASON 75.21.84.5 (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
My biographical entry was deleted. I was a prominent journalist in Chicago before leaving to join the Chicago Symphony Orchestra to manage its record label, CSO Resound. This is similar to running a music label in any other genre, and is therefore prominent and of interest to people who follow the classical-recording industry. My blog is also one of the top 25 most popular classical-music blogs. I feel this meets Wikipedia's notability requirements, which I have read. The admin who deleted my entry states on his (or her) page that they are not to contacted about why an article was deleted. For this reason, I am not going to notify him of this request. Thank you, and please restore my article.
Dance Gavin Dance (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)
The article was deleted because it was lacking in sources, but there are now several reliable sources talking about the album. ([1][2][3]) It is also confirmed to be a self-titled album on each of those sources. One of the sources is even from Alternative Press, so there should be no question of reliability. I'd say more but I don't know what more there is to say; I'll let the sources do the talking. — FatalError 07:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure any of those satisfy WP:RS. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Cassi Davis (closed)
|
|---|
| The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
Cassi Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD) Article, present for quite some time, speedily deleted by User:Alexf on CSD#A7 grounds (no assertion of notability). Davis is a NAACP-award winning (Best Supporting Actress) television and cinema actress, and the last time I saw the article a day or so ago I believe it both asserted notability and passed the notability guidelines, and the cached Google copy does the same as well. I would request, at least, that the article be restored to my userspace if it is determined that it needs additional work. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 01:04, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
|
| The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |