User talk:Roberttheman2008

Speedy deletion of The SNES Game Maker

A tag has been placed on The SNES Game Maker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. [[User talk:Leonard^Bloom|L^BPub]] (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The SNES Game Maker

Your response to the speedy deletion tag of this article seems to indicate that you don't understand why the article is being deleted. The speedy deletion tag is applied when an article has no claim to notability. This does not mean that deletion means the subject does not exist; it simply means that the article does not assert why the subject should be mentioned in an encyclopedia. Many real, non-hoax things are not in Wikipedia, which is as it should be. To successfully contest the deletion, you should add to the article why the subject is notable, and include sources to reliable, third party sources that support your assertions. WP:FIRST explains the policies and methods more clearly. gnfnrf (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Roberttheman2008: I had perfectly legitimate reasons to repost the articale, Jordan William Johnson had not been contacted or a beta version has not shown up. Repost the original aricale now.

Proposed deletion of Unknown Creature, The(2005 movie)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unknown Creature, The(2005 movie), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN‑X-Man 19:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not to be deleted by orders of the copyright owner, Andrew McGee. Unknown Creature's copyright certificate number is PAu2-984-041