User talk:Dp76764
Huh?
What happened? --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I saw that your talk page was erased. Was that you? --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 22:37, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, just making sure you were still on Wikipedia. I've run into some computer problems, so I haven't been able to log on for awhile. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll remember that next time. Good to know you're still here. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 22:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, just making sure you were still on Wikipedia. I've run into some computer problems, so I haven't been able to log on for awhile. --Crackthewhip775 (talk) 22:54, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi, FYI, image placeholders are currently deprecated per here. To save you going crazy & adding any more, of course :D --Rodhullandemu 18:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edit? The lead paragraph of the SecuRom article describes it as "controversial", so why is it a problem to refer to it that way in the Spore article? Skyraider (talk) 23:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
ThinkGeek article deletion?
Regarding the speedy deletion tag on the article ThinkGeek...I noticed this morning that the users who made the speedy deletion requests seem a little fishy themselves, and have been trying to get some admins to look into it. Here is the message I sent to a couple admins:
- Hey, sorry to bother you again, but I have an admin question for you. I noticed this morning that a user named Geekyguild has been going through Wikipedia deleting all links to and mention of some online retailer called ThinkGeek; I have reverted many of these edits because he was compromising the integrity of the article by deleting URLs without paying attention to the context (breaking {{cite web}} templates, creating nonsense sentences, etc.). I also noticed that the ThinkGeek article has been marked as a candidate for speedy deletion because of (apparently) having been created by members of that retailer's staff to generate traffic for their website.
- A few things that seem fishy:
- The ThinkGeek article has a decent edit history, having been edited by 79 different users over 5 years (first edit was made in 2003).
- Both the user Geekyguild and the user who marked the article for speedy deletion, WIKIGUY_PATROL, are users that only just registered this morning, and haven't made any edits other than these attemps to get rid of everything related to ThinkGeek.
- So I was just wondering if you could look into this and see if it's any sort of foul play.
Just thought I'd let you know. --Politizer (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, don't worry about it. I didn't want to remove the template myself because I don't really know the policy for stuff like that, which is why I've just been trying to bring it to the attention of more experienced editors and admins. --Politizer (talk) 15:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Why did You delete my info about Yoda ?? Tdc6502 (talk) 20:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)