User talk:Daedalus969

Daedalus969 is taking an unexpected wikibreak due to computer problems, but hopes to be back soon.

User:Chanakyathegreat

You removed some images from User:Chanakyathegreat stating that "removed per WP:NOT, wikipedia is not an image gallery)". Your interpretation of it is incorrect. That policy is intended for articles whose primary content is images. This is his user page. According to WP:USERPAGE, a user can put "...some of your favorite Wikipedia articles or images (freely licensed only)..." on it. His user page met these requirements. If this weren't the policy, there will be a lot user pages that would need to be revamped, including my own. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 01:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stjimmy61892

How dare you do such a thing. Stjimmy61892 is my friend who created his account at my house. He is NOT my sockpuppet or an alternate account. I do acknowledge that my sockpuppets are me, but Stjimmy61892 is a seperate contributor. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 11:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs /_Improve 05:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if it may seem harsh, but every account created on a computer isn't a sockpuppet. Stjimmy61892 is an entirely separate person. WP:SOCK says that a sockpuppet is an alternate account used for malicious things. Most of the accounts in my case weren't. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 10:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errr if I may, "what the..." I remember a RFCU was made back in March, but I am not aware of further developments. Can you please tell me if an other was CU conducted? On which grounds and by whom? Thanks! -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attacks

Sorry, the testmaster didn't mean to attack anyone. Testmasterflex (talk) 23:05, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]