User talk:Winger84

This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Winger84.

For previous threads, please see my archives.

If you're here to leave any form of RfA thankspam, it goes here please! Thanks!

RE: IPvandal on WIXO

Thanks. Looks like they have already been blocked for 48 hours. I will keep an eye out. Cheers TigerShark (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foxy Loxy's RfA

Hello, this message is to inform you that User:Foxy Loxy has restarted their RfA. The new discussion is located at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Foxy Loxy 2. GlassCobra 10:10, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editor review

I'll try to do a review if I got the time. --Efe (talk) 08:56, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Winger84, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, Spencer^T♦^C 02:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Hello Winger84. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 02:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MJ Morning show

Tell me how scoopthis.org is not a real source? At some point you're going to have to let the truth, and FACTS about Jabberjaw be known.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.13.21 (talk) 12:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a blog, that website fails standing Wikipedia policy on reliable sources. I have no issue with the Jabberjaw situation being mentioned in the article, but until neutral sources (something other than a blog - which has little to no accountability in posted content - or BTLS' website) cover the situation, then the information shall remain POV and that is not permitted on Wikipedia. --Winger84 (talk) 16:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whatcha Think About That

What's with the redirect? The song is a single. It has not been changed. It's a failure and "I Hate This Part" is a rush release single. This is a notable single. In your opinion, it may not be notable because it's a failure. The single EP will be released October 21. Charmed36 (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has not met the standards set forth by MUSIC. It has not charted. It has been performed by other notable acts. My opinion has nothing to do with my redirect of the article. --Winger84 (talk) 21:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The song has charted. It's not mentioned well in the article. The article should not be redirected. Charmed36 (talk) 21:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On what chart? It is well outside the top 40 positions on the CHR/Pop chart and has not received significant airplay on any other chart. The article most certainly should be redirected, at the very least, if not brought up once again for deletion. --Winger84 (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing my previous post, it is currently #55 on the Mediabase CHR/Pop airplay chart, #183 on the CHR/Rhythmic, and does not appear on the Urban chart. What "chart" are you looking at? --Winger84 (talk) 21:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]