User talk:Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc

This is Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22: 10 days

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Moderate to high level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

4.10 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 19:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

MichaelRiconosciuto.jpg

[This topic was moved to Image talk:MichaelRiconosciuto.jpg by Hag2 (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) ][reply]

Me

Thankyou for letting me know.andycjp (talk) 11:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 13:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the warning

this IP is from a school computer, so it may be used by multiple people each day. :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.220.90.98 (talk) 17:15, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BarnStar For You

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for all of your hard work reverting vandalism with the help of huggle! Keep it up!!! ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem :) You deserve it. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for reverting that mstake revert of mine :) ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions About Posting

Was just windering how best to post external links to relevant content without getting reverted. I thought i was following guidelines Duardon (talk) 18:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:World Chess Championship 2008

I don't think you have to be too worried about personal attacks at Talk:World Chess Championship 2008 as apparently User:Sentriclecub considers the remarks to be mocking me. ([1], [2], and [3]). I'm not really sure what he's talking about, however, as his writing is often not very clear. 165.189.91.148 (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes actually I was writing more. I have had a bad day. This person has really brought me down to their level. I baited the person, and shouldn't have to mock him, but here's my day...

- The ip guy continues to make reverts after I gave him a 3rr warning everything outlined here and he continues to violate all the rules but a chess admin gives me a 3rr warnning and not this disruptive user, but just gives him a 2nd 3rr warning which isn't policy. If he breaks the first 3rr warning, its supposed to be a 24 hour block. I'm not well received by the chess community because I proposed chessmetrics for deletion citing WP:NOTE

I basically lost some of my confidence today and acted immature. I don't see why a disruptive editor isn't blocked. He's been harassing me since 14 Oct. and his continued undo's have gotten to me. He or she is not a good writer. No one sees that he's a bad writer, and if they did he would get blocked. I can point to several great edits and contribs which I've worked on, but this editor is given way too much leaniency at my expense. I'm a volunteer, I'm not paid to get harassed. I'm not asking for his block now, because I've taken the page off my watchlist, and I've taken a personal hit from wikipedia and blocking him too late wouldn't fix anything, would just get him more motivated. Sentriclecub (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]