Talk:Cointreau

The definition contradicts that of Triple sec, where it says "Contrary to popular belief, the original triple sec is not Cointreau"

It is tasteful enough to be consumed without additions. It is strong enough to be consumed with care. Cointreau is considered to be either a premium brand

This reads like an advert. The wording should be changed to present a more neutral picture of Cointreau —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.68.153.36 (talk • contribs) .

Well, none of those terms are really hyperbole. I've sourced the 'premium brand' bit to one of the 'reviews', and the other sentences are descriptions of how you drink it, so I don't think those should be removed. Perhaps they should be rewritten - any suggestions? By the way, please consider getting a user account, as having your own name will make it a lot easier to communicate, and you won't have to reveal your IP address. Whether you do or don't, please sign your comments with four tildes like this: ~~~~ --Malthusian (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I left that when cleaning up the previous NPOV issue because as far as I can tell it is factually correct. Perhaps you could suggest a different wording? Zarboki 06:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Text changed82.68.153.36 17:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any more concerns or can we remove the POV tag? --Malthusian (talk) 19:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have already removed it, thatnks for extending the controversy portion and making it more accurate --Jungboho 82.68.153.36 23:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any time. Thanks for adding the initial text. --Malthusian (talk) 23:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't this article have a picture once, I couldn't find it in history. Anyway, we need a picture!! 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)86.132.180.206 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)86.132.180.206 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)~ ~~ 86.132.180.206 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)````` ` 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)86.132.180.206 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)~ 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)~~ ~ ~ 19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)19:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)~ `````[reply]

This article contains an inconsistency with the article triple sec in that this article states the typical alcohol content to be 23%, but the triple sec article says the typical alcohol content is 30%. This article's citation for the 23% number is another Wikipedia article, hence I have added a fact tag. 71.56.242.55 (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]