User talk:Whirl editing
 | An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Edito*Magica (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
"Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Edito*Magica" does not exist.
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
Taking articles to dizzy heights of quality!
also known as:
editing since July 13th 2007.
whirl_editing
whirl_editing began contributing to Wikipedia on January 24th 2009, replacing Edito*Magica, who was wrongly blocked after being accused of vandalism. This misunderstanding came about because Edito*Magica sometimes uses a shared internet service and thus I.P address.
The whirl pool
Your comments are always welcome...
- Hi,
What do think about moving the character descriptions to a new page?...there is already character description in the plot section, and i think the character section does make the page a little too long? Tell me what you think. Thanks.Whirl*editing (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, I think we discussed this before when you were Edito*Magica, but I still think it's a bad idea - the page needs character descriptions to make it comprehensive for readers. By comparison to some articles, the page isn't very long at all, and it's not justified to have a separate page for what are essentially six major characters. There aren't that many minor recurring characters, either, so it wouldn't even be justified as an extended page. In my experience, individual character pages tend to be rather poor quality, and if you look at Wikipedia article traffic statistics, spin-off pages are rarely viewed. Bob talk 15:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Additionally, articles about fiction should be discussed in a real-world context. The lists you have been creating do not conform to that guideline and are at risk of being deleted. The JPStalk to me 16:14, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok fair enough. People not visiting spin-off pages has always been a concern of mine, and i will begin tidying the character descriptions up soon. Thanks.Whirl*editing (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2009 (UTC)