User talk:Ged UK

HOW'S MY EDITING?

Please review me!

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is Ged UK's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

November 2007 - August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

cross wiki link on Fable (video game)

Hi Ged UK, You are right, la:Balverine is a different thing than Fable (video game), the problem was on la-wiki, where Balverine was pointing to en:Fable (video game) so my bot RibotBOT automatically added it to en-wiki ... like any other bot... I corrected la-wiki in order to prevent any other bot may add this wrong link to en:Fable (video game). regards. --Loupeter (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Ged UK (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, it's doing it again! I don't know what to change on the La wiki, would you be able to have another look? --Ged UK (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, it was a test to verify the links ... I think this time I corrected it by erasing the link to la-wiki on all others languages. In this way any bot cannot link it again to en-wiki. (A bot works like this: If A is linked with B, and B is linked with C then A must be linked with C). --Loupeter (talk) 07:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see, how bizarre! Thanks! --Ged UK (talk) 11:03, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rangers Nicknames

How was it not constructive? Rangers are refered to with all these names Fry2000 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fry2000 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're muddling me up with someone else. --Ged UK (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oh, sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fry2000 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this guy loves dicks

i saw him sucking 3 at once —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.165.173.27 (talk) 20:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, i see you're a voyeur then? --Ged UK (talk) 08:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kuyt

Hi. I think we've crossed paths before with something - can't remember when! I noticed the discussion at WT:FOOTY and possible socks... the place to go is WP:SPI. :) D.M.N. (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we've communicated before about something, though I can't remember what! I wasn't sure that I wanted to start at the SPI page, but I think you're probably right. I'll take it there. --Ged UK (talk) 14:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm not sure that I'm confident enough in my suspicions, and the process is a bit alarming. If you think that there's enough to go on, let me know, and I'll pick it up again. Never done a SPI request before, and don't want to start on one doomed to fail. --Ged UK (talk) 15:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the barnstar Ged. I really appreciate it, and Silkyfoxboy is perhaps an even better name! To be honest when I started editing a year ago I never expected to spend much time on football articles but I found that many articles needed much work—most suffer from recentism, have a healthy dose of POV, and can become little more than a list of dates and goals. It actually made me realise how hollow football journalism is. No end of year round-ups, few enlightening interviews, the needless "speculation" used altruistically by agents and the press to guarantee larger fees/circulations. That's why I'm keen to write full length leads for articles, it means that they usually get what they want in a few sentences rather than wading through the whole thing. Cheers all the same! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

I'm looking at your userpage using firefox and it's a mess :-( There is text overlapping the userboxes. I thought you'd want to know. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? It looks OK on my Firefox. Which bit? It is a mess anyway, I need to do something with it anyway, but wikiformatting hurts my brain. --Ged UK (talk) 21:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ged UK Screenshot.png This is what I am seeing with Firefox 2.0.0.21pre on Ubuntu. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How strange. I wonder if it's an ubuntu/firefox issue, because it's fine on FF on Vista, and IE6 on Windows 2000, and on FF on OSX? I don't know enough about HTML and webpage layouts to suggest a cause, or solution. --Ged UK (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the cause is css on the page not being correctly rendered. It could be Ubuntu I suppose. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Makes no sense to me. I have a geek Ubuntu user friend who may be able to suggest something. --Ged UK (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the page and fixed the problems as I see the, Check if ir's still OK for you. Theresa Knott | token threats 12:20, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine for me! Thanks :) --Ged UK (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kyal

I included it because it is the only place on the web where Kyal is with Charlotte and they are obviously boyfriend/girlfriend. If someone is curious about Charlotte, they go to that person's post I referenced. It's just more proof. What better than photos? Sure, the site is not reliable, but photos don't lie :-p. Reminds me of the saying "diamond in the rough."