Talk:Alveolar macrophage

Typo

Problem with "inorganic materials such as carbon".

Was this a typo?

AkashAD (talk) 03:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

While this article is quite long (probably too long), it is very difficult to read and need significant improvement, so I classed it as a stub for now. Schu1321 (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Additions

I'm not sure how others feel about the large text submission to this article, but I think it was almost easier to read when it was the shorter version. I'm not opposed to adding in some of the information from the paper, but perhaps restoring it to the previous version and selectively adding information might be a better route to go? Comments? Schu1321 (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it's not cited that dust cells migrate back up to be swallowed after phagocytizing particles. also, read somewhere that on average we swallow about ten thousand a day.

Title renaming

I think it would be closer to actual usage to have "alveolar macrophage" as the primary name and not "dust cell". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.69.225.13 (talk) 06:47, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]