Jump to content

User talk:Dayewalker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MrSpammy (talk | contribs) at 04:08, 18 March 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my page, and go Celtics! Leave a message for me below, and I'll respond on this page unless you ask otherwise.

Just so everyone will know, on June 29, 2008, I was given the Rollback tool by admin Kralizec! for help in vandal-fighting. I will also use this tool to revert, on sight, the edits of blocked wikipedia users. If you have a question about my use of rollback, it was probably in one of these situations. Any other questions, leave them here on my talk page. Thanks! Dayewalker (talk) 22:11, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are an IP and cannot post on this page, it has been semi-protected. Admins regularly semi-protect this page against IPs who come here to disrupt. Please leave a message on the talk page for the article you'd like to discuss. I'd suggest registering an account, it makes everything easier.

Thank you...

...for your kind words. We'll see how things go in a few months. You're right that some (somewhat over 50 percent) "get me", whereas the other group is "stuck" with me. >:) I was accused of not taking wikipedia or the nomination seriously. I didn't quite say this, but I hinted at it, a quote (as I recall it, anyway) from The Trouble With Tribbles, where the annoying space station manager Nilz Baris (William Schallert, an excellect character actor in his day) is accusing Kirk of not being serious about the quadro-triticale project. Kirk retorts to Baris that he takes the project very seriously, and that "It's you I do not take seriously!" Think that would have helped? Maybe not. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:35, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Our buddy's at it again...

You know who's back and he's a-trollin'. Check out my talk page edits. --ChrisP2K5 (talk) 04:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for the revert [1]! --Kralizec! (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

Impossible to get when you're trying to reason with rabid liberals.MrSpammy (talk) 04:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]