Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media Temple (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ucla2009 (talk | contribs) at 18:53, 19 March 2009 (→‎Media Temple: DELETE). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Media Temple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

advertising without relevant content. content not suitable for an encyclopedia. self-promotion and product placement. lacks substantial 3rd party objective evidence of notability from reliable sources Arrowhead (talk) 07:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mysteriously, two users seem to have nominated this article within a few hours of each other, causing all sorts of confusion. The other one, Sinope09 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), used the following incredibly similar nomination text at WP:AFD/Media Temple (2nd nomination):
They advertise their product/service without relevant content. The content and subject is not suitable for an encyclopedia. The company's position is for self-promotion and product placement and the article lacks substantial 3rd party objective evidence of notability from reliable sources.
I've speedily closed the other AFD as redundant to this one. Zetawoof(ζ) 09:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a mystery. The creator of the article tried to delete the first second nomination AFD. Arrowhead (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. All of these issues appear to have been addressed in the previous AfD, which was closed as "keep". While the current sources are a little subpar, they're adequate, and I see no content in the article which seems particularly advertorial. Zetawoof(ζ) 09:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article is self advertising (which is not a goal of the Wikipedia)and there is not even one 3rd party references given. Nothing links to this article. Additionally Media Temple is a small not notable company (for an Encyclopedia like Wikipedia) which doesn't even have an ORCA entry (see ORCA.bpn.gov). Media Temple is not a pioneer of grid-hosting (see as reference: I. Foster, C. Kesselman, The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, 1999). Arrowhead (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]