This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Dynaflow(talk | contribs) at 05:36, 1 April 2009(moving post-facto comment off archived page onto attached Talk page). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 05:36, 1 April 2009 by Dynaflow(talk | contribs)(moving post-facto comment off archived page onto attached Talk page)
I am not disputing the decision, just saying that from the point of view of bona fide academic response, Wikipedia moves very quickly. Further, I don't see any consensus here - how is it actually decided that there's consensus? I may be completely wrong (as this discussion is confused and opaque to me) how does linguistics end up with "meaning"? Is there a disambiguation article proposed? I'm so confused. Unconfuse me. --Levalley (talk) 03:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)LeValley[reply]
