Wikipedia talk:Tutorial (historical)/Talk pages

Christina Colalillo

Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)===University of Pittsburgh===[reply]

Bachelor of Communications

Astrofish (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it does Cassiegz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

It sure does!ChristinaColalillo (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

woohoo! 21:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.92.12 (talk)

I'm still confused with this time signature thing so I'm going to try again! Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Cassiegz(talk)Cassiegz (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

ok I'm trying again Cassiegz (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and again. Cassiegz (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Test test

Test

1
- 2
3

=== End Test === 173.105.250.202 (talk) 21:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mean, really. not really, I'm a programmer, so this is really no problem. Testing123 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that with our level of technology today that a better editor should be implemented but I think the ease and simplicity of the wiki code is perfect for entry level programing. Trent McCrow (talk) 05:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's called an otcothorpe ? Woah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.88.159.18 (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who knew? Davesmith au (talk) 01:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

God knew. God knew it was an octothorpe. Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ya LieutenantLeo (talk)

More to come :D AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you suck

srsly, and this is why

youre a programmer
- youre in a sandbox
  - you dont have a bullet list —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.202.172 (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok here we go...--Bigshoulderscreator (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Like this?

Indents like this

and like this?

Yes. Like this. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bullets like

this
this
- and this?

Numbers like

this
1. and this?
and also this?

Signing off like this? Oodles More the biggest idiot ever (talk) 22:54, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awright!

What prevent me from modifying other people's comments? Jonathan dumas (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing, as far as I * can tell! Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is interesting! I want to bullet the upper statement for fun and see what is going to happen!

Oodles More (talk)

I am new (deletion test)--Deathoftheworld (talk) 18:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really THAT stupid? Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So this might make sense but my concerns are:

i'll get lost in the "conversation"
i'll miss any number of comments made
i'll get too bullet/number crazy

out. Hart2Harts (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO. This tutorial board is extremely funny. lol.

--Kurtcool2 (talk) 12:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is that.

Potatoe.
Space potatoe.
1. Greenlobe
2. Bluerash
Subspace potatoe

Queen Spiral (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another test

Notables

Notable 1

Notable 2

Notable 3

1Notable 1
1. 2Notable 2
  1. 3Notable 3

- - Notable 3
Notable 1
- Notable 2

I don't get the numbers, I'll be back ZVNC (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable 1
Notable 2
1. Notable. 2.5
  1. Notable 2.25
Notable 3

Now I get it! ZVNC (talk) 02:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank God you now get it,I am still trying to.

I have list of things I would like to do

Read as much as i can
Take time to understand
1. What I have read
2. Assimilate it
Digest it, then regurgitate it.

Ochawhite (talk) 12:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TEST! TEST! IGLOO TEST!Guardian entei (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is my test

--Arvid Carlander (talk) 23:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More Tests

Yep, More

Uno
Dos
Tres

AlexDuarte (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I confused 4 of this: ~ with 4 of this: * -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardian entei (talk • contribs) 12:05, 4 February 2009 (UTC) hmm this is kinda tricky 04:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.1.73 (talk) [reply]

What do you mean, Header?

And a Sub-Header?

What kind of text editing system is this?

(A decent one)

This
1. Sign
Has a strange name

Give the bullets a chance!
- I completely agree

Bullets get no chance.

They should!

Definitely not

Should.

--SixtySuit (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could? RobertLClegg (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amazio (talk)LOL!

1. 1. 1. 1. tHIS
Is
1. 1. A
Thing

- - - - That
is
1. FUNNY!

''''BOLD!?'''' fu+Q —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amazio (talk • contribs) 23:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another test.

Does anyone else have problems remembering all the proper codes?

One colon for one indentation;

Two for two;

And so on.

Now for bullet points.

One asterisk for one bullet point.
- Two for two;
  - Etc.

And finally, numbering:

One number sign for one number;
1. Two for two;
  1. more for more!--Ekias (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First comment Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Second commentSargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply with unordered list:

First
Second
- About the second
- Also about the second
Third Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something new Sargentprivate (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply with ol: Sargentprivate (talk)

First
Second
1. About the second
2. Also about the second
Third

People are making no sense here... lol NinjaTweak (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it made sense, it would be an actual Wiki page now wouldn't it ; ) HA! NinjaBack!! RobertLClegg (talk) 00:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These can be found in a first aid box

Scissors
Spirit
cotton wool

Ochawhite (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My little test

Thank goodness Wikipedia exists so that people with RPG handles can use those skills honed by years of talking smack in internet forums and chat rooms!

Blitzkrieg Bop

Hey...

Ho?

Let's Go!

The Blitzkrieg Bop

They're forming in straight line.
1. They're going through a tight wind.
  1. The kids are losing their minds.

"The Blitzkrieg Bop"

They're piling in the back seat.
- They're generating steam heat.
  - Pulsating to the back beat.

Nodgarden —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

new header

I'm NOT a programmer so getting the hang of this editing lark is taking ages! —Preceding unsigned comment added by KitBull (talk • contribs) 11:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't they just structure the discussions like a forum? Why does it have to be an actual wiki that can be edited? --Raijin8 (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IntAuto (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is all I have to say. --Queen Spiral (talk) 12:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a test, too.

I'm not sure what I'm doing.

It's not terribly hard to do.

Just a lot to remember.
- I like Wikipedia.

1. It's informative.
2. Yea, Wikipedia!

IntAuto (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2009 (UTC) --[reply]

Good work

It's a good circle

People liking wiki is the reason ppl are editing it.
ppl who like it are editing it

Wiki being good makes more ppl like wiki
- - More ppl who likes wiki makes more who edits it

and it goes round and round

my tester :)

so yer let's see

if i can remember

hello

fljd
kdjfalgj

gha

kgfjkl
gsfhlsghl

--7eden (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chiming in on what I hear earlier, about the learning curve being steep for non-programmers. Definitely agree.

Wikipedia currently has an impressive level of detail in its articles but it could be better

The problem, however, is that most academics (the people who could provide that detail) are old enough that this is just too difficult

So rather than wait 20-30 years for academics who grew up with the internet, it'd make sense to invest in an idiot proof coding system —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercurial454 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Mukalla Sea Fisheries & Marketing (does this count as spam?)

Al Mukalla Sea Fisheries & Marketing is Yemeni national company, established in 2003 in Yemen . Al Mukalla Sea website

We are an export company for all kinds of fish (fresh, frozen and dried) Our products include: yellow fin tuna, cuttlefish, grouper, Indian Mackerel, catfish , sailfish, octopus, bananafish, squid, shrimps, lobster, croaker, snapper , barracuda, queen fish ,sea bream ,trevally, kingfish, emperor, sea cucumber and all kind of sea products produce as per buyer requirements : Whole-Gutted-steaks-fillet etc.

- Deals in catching, processing & exporting several kind of fish & Sea products - Exporting: Fresh, Frozen & Dried Fish of several sorts & other sea products. - Owners of fishing boats that sail in the Aden Gulf and the Arab Sea ( Indian Ocean ) - Also: deal in local market with local fishermen collecting their production together with ours, which they catch from the long Yemeni long coasts which exceeds 1000 miles . - Mainly exporters to: East Asia , Middle East & Europe.

--Aiman Elkhalifa 14:41, 25 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by NileBoy (talk • contribs)

--- Think Im getting the hang of this! Siliconwombat (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 17:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

hi

hi I am new to wikipedia!

--Fodgert (talk) 01:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)fodgert[reply]

me too --Mvh2 (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it's more fun than working, don't you think? --17:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

It is, unless you're crazy and spend all your time just editing, editing, editing, editing, .... Queen Spiral (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

oh really? me too (ish) what a surprise --7eden (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A test, of course!

Igloo again!!!--Guardian entei (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just testin'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardian entei (talk • contribs) 12:18, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo-would. Oh!--Guardian entei (talk) 12:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your test... it failed! Oh Noes!! Queen Spiral (talk)

NO! I WAS WRONG! IT WAS EARTH ALL ALONG! 12:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Balanced Poverty Level

Balanced Poverty level . (Not Mollies follies)

Some activist's wants the poverty level to reflect anyone who cannot afford rent, and, food at the same time. I am a Maine activist who believes we must end 100% of poverty and that there are 80 additional million in poverty but not counted. Total 120 million people in poverty, or half of America.

Our current conception of the U.S. federal poverty level measure was introduced to the American public in 1965. IT was a landmark study by Mollie Orshanky, an economist at the Social Security Administration. We have lived lifetimes with Mollies follies since then The Poverty level was suppose to be a criterion for identifying households in poverty, It is based upon the amount required for an adequate diet at minimum cost.

Our current federal poverty level, is Mis-measure of Poverty.

By Nicholas Eberstadt http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/3930481.html

Orshansky presented the poverty thresholds as a measure of income inadequacy, not of income adequacy -Isn't it time to end 100% of poverty? It is time that not just the amount of lowest cost food, but all of Lives basics are taking into account, as the poverty level.

So the poverty level is raised to cover all of the following rent, food, transportation, health care, Utilities ect. Workers are the back bone of America. They should have enough for savings and a vacation.

In fact, Mollies Follies, boss Ida’s Merriam, wrote in 1967, that "It is easy to observe that poverty in the U.S. today cannot meaningfully be defined in the same way as in the U.S. of 1900....obviously today's [poverty] measure, even if corrected year by year for changes in the price level...should not be acceptable twenty, ten or perhaps even five years hence." http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/papers/relabs.htm But we have used flawed measurements, since 1965. It decades past time, to say poverty can be ended when we use the correct tools which is a “balanced income,” enough to cover modest expensive, instead of a minimum wage. In Maine minimum wages are higher than the Federal level. It is $7.25 an hour, yet in 2007, a think tank in Maine, said the least required to pay all of lives basics are $17.16 an hour for 40 hours. Different states have different livable wages. Do you think any states livable wage is $9.50 an hour? Not with rents starting around $ 700 a month in Mississippi, there is no place with cheap rent. A “BALANCED” POVERTY LEVEL, WILL END 100% OF POVERTY www.hospitalityhouseofmaine.org

Rents now cost more than food costs. Tell Congress it is no longer OK to be homeless, on the current defective poverty level. < Mis-measure of Poverty. By Nicholas Eberstadt http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/3930481.html> <http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/papers/relabs.htm> <www.hospitalityhouseofmaine.org copied with premission>

Hello

Hello! Queen Spiral (talk) 12:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parsnips
Kittens
Robot pirates
Space zombie vampire hunters
- Space zombie vampire hunters who are monkeys
  - Lobsters who become space zombie vampire hunters and monkeys

These are a few of my favorite things (not really...) Queen Spiral (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let no spam fall upon the shores. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Queen Spiral (talk • contribs) 12:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flamingos!

This here is a flamingo covered in a number of items

Feathers

Funny Stuff Wyvern Darkblood (talk)
1. Mashed Potatoes
2. Liquid Love of Lizards Wyvern Darkblood (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
3. Rhino Laughter
  1. Belly Laughs

1. Snorts

Excrement

Goo Gone 20:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

umm what?

Request for change of main page....

If you wanted to ask a question about an article, or you have a concern or comment, you can put a note in the article's talk page. You do that by clicking the "discussion" tab at the top of the page. Do not worry if the link shows up in red; it is all right to create the talk page if it does not already exist.

Should the ' "discussion" ' be ' "talk"'! as this is the tab I see?

comment 79.129.242.100 (talk) 16:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see it as 'discussion'. Great to practice these things every once in a while, hehe...

Mfhulskemper (talk) 01:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Colbackp (talk • contribs) 17:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

this is a comment —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.129.242.100 (talk) 16:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Brent Bunn

Bren bunn is captain of the s.s doogandogan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squallar (talk • contribs) 14:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Brent Bunn

Bren bunn is captain of the s.s doogandogan Squallar (talk) 14:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test heading again

Did I get it right this time? Discuss

Hopefully Astrofish (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I reckon so!Astrofish (talk)

I disagree

No way

I think it worked. Astrofish (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tester testing tests testily -- headers!

Yes/no/maybe? Helixical (talk) 16:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a genius. Helixical (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now what if I were to test... bullets?

Bullets are crazy
Bullets are fun
Bullets hurt (or so I'm told)
Silver bullets are for vampires
- Really?
  - No kidding!

Helixical (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The World Could Use a Couple More Testing Areas

Now am I right, or am I right? Probably neither. Smileyfriies (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Probably both, as a matter of fact. I think. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightningstreak (talk • contribs) 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Test and preview prior to becoming permanent! Testing... --Brie28lynn (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My head is spinning on citations I expect people will jump on me if I get the format wrong [[User:Fiberdiva (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)]][reply]

That's exactly why I love the Preview feature. I always tend to chop them off. Mfhulskemper (talk) 01:45, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just testing stuff out

Is this a bullet?

A bullet and an indent?

- I sure think so...2 bullets now

how do you adda bullet?
1. lets see if this works
  1. or this
2. if not maybe this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhynes (talk • contribs) 14:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

14:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

again and agian and agian —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhynes (talk • contribs) 14:16, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Dhynes (talk) 14:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sheri

Who is she?

cool
very cool
annoyed by people who think there is only one way to spell this name (e.g., sherry...) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.171.236 (talk) 23:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]