Talk:EATPUT
Appearance
Response to request for deletion
I tried sprucing the page up a bit with a graphic. It sounds like your big concern is that this doesn't qualify as "notable" per Wikipedia's policies. I read Wikipedia's page on that and their guidelines are very subjective. Obviously I do think it is notable, it is a little difficult to find online resources relating to EATPUT since it was originally developed in the 1960s and has been further honed since then.
A quick bing.com search of "EATPUT model" seems to indicate at least 3 or 4 universities who use EATPUT in their curriculum along with a few books mentioning EATPUT, just on the first page of results.
I could write more I guess, but is this not enough to make it notable? Mwv2 (talk) 07:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)