User talk:158.143.166.124

If you bother to check, you'll see I've been doing this a lot longer than you. Your edit was reverted because you failed to give any evidence or explanation for your claim that a man called William is known as "Bob". Katharineamy (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Is that really the case? I've been a Wikipedian since 2002. How about you? 158.143.166.124 (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2009 (UTC) 

Then why are you editing without logging in, from an IP with no edits before this month? I see now that you've changed everything you wrote to "Bill", which makes more sense and so I'll leave it alone. But please note that I do not do test edits. Katharineamy (talk) 17:38, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I thought I wrote Bill in the first place, so Bob was a typo/mistake. The name issue was discussed at the talk page. I've attended lectures with Bill Blair, so I know he's not called William in daily use any more than Tony Blair is called Anthony. IP addresses change regularly, and I can't do anything about that. I prefer to edit as an anonymous rather than as a registered user, and that is also perfectly alright. There is a strong tradition at this project, or at least used to be, not to discriminate against anonymous users as opposed to those who use an account. 158.143.166.124 (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Darwinek (talk) 19:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by vandalizing Landkreis Teschen article, persistent incivility and avoiding discussion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. --Darwinek (talk) 19:48, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment on blocks

(The following comment was made after User:Darwinek was blocked for edit warring, also note the comment that his admin privileges had been removed on a previous occasion for similar conduct - "has displayed a pattern of poor judgment in performing administrative actions, including blocking users (...) with whom he was engaged in a dispute, and improperly move-protecting articles to enforce a title preference" and "has engaged in incivil behavior and personal attacks"):

I think it's fair that the block was undone and both I and User:Darwinek were blocked by a third party, as we both were in violation of 3RR. I only created the account User:U158, which I made clear was me, in order to report this issue and in order to ensure that User:Darwinek was not able to enforce his POV by abusively blocking me, his opponent in an edit war over content and NPOV. A user who has been blocked for such conduct should not remain an admin. I will consider what to do in this regard when the block expires. Thanks for reading. 158.143.166.124 (talk) 21:21, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

(Interesting enough, it's not the first time User:Darwinek is banned. He was previously blocked by Jimbo Wales for "personal attack" (19 January 2006) and by Phil Boswell for "edit-warring and incivility" (4 June 2007).[1]) 158.143.166.124 (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment on WP:ANI case concerning User:Darwinek

User:Darwinek is a disruptive editor, who behaved in a highly disruptive way, repeatedly (by revert-warring and abusive use of rollback tool) reinstating spelling errors in articles (Jerzy Buzek: [2][3], Austria-Hungary cannot be referred to as "the Austria-Hungary" in English, "after the 1939 it was..." does not make sense in English - but maybe in Polish?) and inconsistency, despite being told he was in error. He refuses to discuss his edits (Talk:Jerzy Buzek). Furthermore, he is a Polish nationalist POV pusher. This is a fact, and it does not surprise me that other long-time members of the Polish lobby are rushing to his defense now. It's very unfortunate that a lot of Central European topics at this project are largely controlled by disruptive Polish nationalist POV pushers, just have a look at Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars, Wikipedia would save a lot of time and trouble by blocking all access to the English project from Poland. And I was not being more uncivil to him than he was to me - he accused me of "vandalism" despite the fact that he is the vandal, who was messing up grammar and consistency, revert-warring, refusing to discuss, and pushing POV. But I did not block him, that's the whole difference. I don't trust his "apologies" at all, clearly he's only interested in retaining his admin rights in order to continue to abuse other editors and enforce his Polish POV (and odd grammar), as he's done before, and he's broken all his promises before as well. This time, he needs to be permanently desysopped. This project does not need people like him as administrators. I'm fed up by Eastern European nationalist POV pushers (with a poor command of English), and so are a lot of other non-Eastern European users. 158.143.212.147 (talk) 11:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

As a statement by User:Darwinek, where he once again attacks me, has been posted to WP:ANI (despite the fact that he is currently blocked), I request that my response is also posted there for fair process. 158.143.166.124 (talk) 15:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Your vandalism

Your vandalism and manipulation. The "Austria-Hungary" is not correct English? Please, correct. Only correct name "Austrian-Hungary". Not revert. LUCPOL (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are trying to say. You are the one reverting. I'm really fed up by having to make the same simple corrections over and over again. 158.143.166.124 (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

---