Jump to content

User talk:DrKay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aggiebean (talk | contribs) at 21:36, 21 July 2009 (→Weekend). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

George IV of the United Kingdom

Hi. Do you mind telling me why: (without reason, excuse, discusion, or consensus) you removed the George IV (Public domain & Statute law) oath of allegiance text??? Regards Steve. Stephen2nd (talk) 12:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it goes anywhere, it should be at wikisource. Not here. This is an encyclopedia, not a repository for primary texts. DrKiernan (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, and thanks for your reply. Many regards. Steve.Stephen2nd (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anderson

  • I apologise if I was responsible for a mix-up with another user out there. Just dropping a line to let you know that arguing the merits of I, Anastasia is a fool's errand. Honestly, a fraudulent work, written about a fraud, which the fraud herself denounced?? Is this your progress? Secondly, I think it's an excellent suggestion to add a section to the entry about the actual damage done by AA's fraud. Now that is a good argument to iron-out and make feasible. And I think someone ought to re-introduce how to use Kurth in the entry, for certain editors sing high notes out certain orifices when his name is dropped, but dropped into the entry his name must be! It's better than the stupid cart story and I, Anastasia discussions.75.21.145.152 (talk) 05:14, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Kiernan! Are you going to continue to allow certain editors at Anna Anderson to continue the fruitless mess on the talk page? John K has said some valid things, questioned in a valid way and he's being attacked. Aggiebean as usual is trying to bake his oysters and I noticed that Finnegan is using his infamous "red" signature again. Why don't you do your damned job there? And by the way, as aggie says "Just for the record": Nishkid64 is starting to look a bit like an amateur editor by allowing an old username (RevAntonio) to continue to be displayed on his talk page. Your Asshole Rules, not mine, none has the right to do a thing like that.75.21.103.101 (talk) 06:10, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything that can be done to get us back to work on the consensus article? We were making great progress until the addition of the return of the long winded rants touting pro Anderson content. This has caused the discussion to digress once again to a merry go round to nowhere. This is exactly what caused problems in the past and it's happening again. This is why we went to the admin page for help, and we were getting it, but now it's stalled. All my pleas to get back on track have been ignored and buried by yet more rhetoric. Regardless of who is doing it, it must stop if we are to get anywhere. Please help.Aggiebean (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it all needs to get back on track DrK. The irrational rabid AA supporters have no interest whatsoever of assisting you with the page. They just want to rant repeatedly using totally discredited nonsense. There will be no progress while their fantasy trash is allowed to waste time. It's time to move on. You can see it will be basically impossible to write a biography of Anderson while they impede progress dredging up proven historically proven claptrap. ChatNoir24 has been warned by a number of administrators to stop his nonsense and JohnK appears to be engaging in the same unusual practice. It is very easy to see how the edit war and distortion occurred due to those who have no interest in reality pushing POV discredited agendas. Their latest tactic, one that has been used by rabid AA supporters for ages, is to attack those who knew hard fact about Anastasia and refused to be pressured into accepting Schankowska when they knew she was nothing but a fraud. It's time this all stopped as it is highly destructive and totally irrational. Finneganw 05:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh yes, Kiernan, your Masters are calling on you now, best get to it! Forget finnie's red signature and aggie's bullying tactics. ChatNoir is back! And now you're letting him trample it all over again too. But please, by all means obey the bean and the Alleged Australian, they know best, don't they?75.21.116.146 (talk) 06:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weekend

I'm glad you had a break over the weekend. Finneganw 09:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some of us would be glad if YOU had a break.75.21.99.46 (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be glad your computer would break.Aggiebean (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrKay&oldid=303414339"