Jump to content

User talk:Z.K. HAL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 92.2.6.43 (talk) at 03:01, 14 August 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

please could you change michael jackson sales they don't seem right it cant be 350 all these sources say he has sold 750 million his offical website and sony records have also said this they can not be lying

http://www.michaeljackson.com/ie/news/michael-jacksons-it-be-presented-theaters-around-world

http://press.sonymusic.com/2009/06/26/sony-comments-on-the-passing-of-michael-jackson

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1614815/20090626/jackson_michael.jhtml

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Music/03/05/uk.jackson.comeback/ http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/26/2609049.htm

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/WinterConcert/wireStory?id=7075284

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/06/entertainment/michaeljackson/main5137816.shtml http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/06/entertainment/main3461884.shtml

http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1614815/20090626/jackson_michael.jhtml

http://cbs2.com/entertainment/michael.jackson.hospitalized.2.1059895.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/music/26jackson.html?_r=1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/25/AR2009062503127.html

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/wpix-michael-jackson-heart-attack,0,6959872.story

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29531056/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Showbiz-News/Michael-Jackson-Memorial-Service---In-Numbers/Article/200907115331455

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8121749.stm 14) http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/f27ec8db-af05-4f36-916e-3d57f91ecf5e etc

if you read Thugs-n-Harmonyharout section in best selling artist Harout72 says articles published by major record companies such as Sony Music are acceptable but for michael jackson its different why is this