User talk:Fastily

Marionettes

The edit I made about Bert appearing as marionette wasn't intended to be vandalism, but unfortunately I don't know how to source it as it's something I've seen in videos but never written down anywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.0.83.207 (talk) 04:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Evessen

I don´t know why my edits are considered unconstructive, I´ve the commons cat and the coat of arms, please check again. I´ll revert your changes, hope it´s ok. Elmschrat (talk) 10:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Only half right

I just happened to notice your remark on my RFA that my answers to your questions were 'only half right.' Well, how am I to learn without further instruction? ;) Nosleep ^{break my slumber} 03:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Howard Studios

Hello,

I noticed that the Michael Howard Studios page was taken down. Please help me to understand what caused this and how to repost it correctly. The page was created very similar to a template on Stella Adler ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Adler_Conservatory ) and was not meant to be an advertisement but an informational page devoted to the studio. The studio is the longest running private acting studio in the country, thus I believe it deserves to have a wiki page.

If you have any thoughts or recommendations for me, please let me know. It is important to me to get the page back up and running, but I want to do it within the correct guidelines.

Thank you so much in advance.

Justin Daniel —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justindanielnyc (talk • contribs) 21:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Warning I Received

Fastily, you are wrong about the warning you've sent me. I am not vandalizing Wikipedia, and it's inappropriate to accuse me of this behavior when it is not true, just to justify the warning. So, if you could see that I am not vandalizing, and recant the warning, that would be great. 71.12.0.105 (talk) 01:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like to comment. The tip you received is misleading. I actually had not violated the three revert rule, and I was removing the ref in question because it wasn't acceptable for the reason that it's webpage did not show up for me and with the same informatin as it did for other users. I mentioned this to the user "antiuser," (although after he had already tipped you off about me) and he/she understood and proceeded to put up another ref that did show up for me as it did for him. So, can the warning be removed? 71.12.0.105 (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you very much. 71.12.0.105 (talk) 02:14, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

I saw in my talk page a warning about vandalism the article Greek Basketball Cup. And I wonder why, as:
The article says that the first Greek Cup took place in the year 1966 and also says that Aris B.C. and AEK B.C. won the 1966 and 1969 cups, using a Catalan Basketpedya source. That one and only (unreliable for me) source is a source, but I already put seven different official and independent sources proving that this never happened:

Official Greek Basketball Federation Site (in Greek) doesn't say something like that.
Aris B.C. official site (in English) doesn't say something like that.
AEK B.C. Official site (in Greek) doesn't say something like that. Also:
The-Sports.org (in English) doesn't say something like that.
Contra.gr (in Greek) doesn't say something like that.
Sport.gr (in Greek) doesn't say something like that.
Superbasket.gr (in Greek) doesn't say something like that.

And I'm wondering:

Why the one and only source is accepted and those seven different official and independent sources (except the Official Greek Basketball Federation Site who says different things!) are not accepted in the article?
Why all the rest editions of Wikipedia (Greek, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Finnish) don't say those things?
Who's the real vandal here? Dimitrissss (talk) 10:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Fastily for the understanding. I don't want to discuss for the moment with the user:Wiki Greek Basketball. I only want from him or anyone else, just not to pull off my official and independent sources I've already add in the article Greek Basketball Cup. Thanks again. Dimitrissss (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nielsen Book

Hi My name is Huma, I work for Nielsen Book, it seems you have deleted our last entry and the reason in the deletion box is "advertising". We would like to have the meaning of our products and services to the industry on this site for reference. I will therefore revisit the copy and adapt it. Would it be useful to send it to you for review before uploading it again? Many Thanks Huma Huma.Ashraf@nielsen.com Nielsen Book (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I recently submitted a page for Chauvet lighting which was deleted for being too advertorial. Is there any way I can get the coded page back? I want to try and re submit the article with a more neutral point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haitiansensati0n2 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing Questions

I am writing an informational article. The article is titled "Red Star, White Star by SPI, Inc.". Red Star, White Star (hereafter, RSWS) is/was a tabletop wargame produced by Simulations Publications, Inc. in the 1970s. A separate Wikipedia article on SPI does not mention the game title RSWS. I want to supply that information either through a separate article or by editing the SPI article to include it. I wanted to include an illustration of the playing pieces that I found on the Internet. The picture is nothing more than a few of the playing pieces arranged and photographed (close-up for detail) on the mapsheet included with the game. I haven't the slightest idea how that would be licensed or by who. Does this disqualify it for use in the article?

The deletion log lists you as the editor that killed the picture. It was titled "RSWS_Counters.jpg". If the picture is a no-go then I will merely drop the idea or just edit/amend the SPI article and not use the picture.

Best...

--Jeffrey D. Fisher, MCP, DCSE (talk) 19:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jfisher944 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We're always in the market for new articles, but bear in mind the following policies: Notability, No Original Research, and Conflict of Interest. --King Öomie 19:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Deekieweekieblob is an obvious sockpuppet of the banned User:Pioneercourthouse. He created this sleeper account on August 8th, waited a week, made a few useless edits (all of which have been reverted) and then jumped to try to "test" on a Pioneer Courthouse page - where he was stopped by the filter. Please reblock and take away his right to edit his talk page. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 07:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, you already got it. Thank you! The above detail is just to point out that the guy followed the usual M.O., including cries of innocence. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 07:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: This is intended to be a biography for Jim Diamond aka Mega Genius for which I have recived permission from to be his offical biographer. I would be happy to revise the biography so that it does not reflect (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) by deleting website links changing the title to Jim Diamond instead of Mega Genius and sections of the biography. However his work is one of his personal accomplishments to be included in his biography.Deadalus821 (talk) 19:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

happyface_wallpaper.png

Hello. I believe you nominated the image I uploaded, happyface_wallpaper.png, for deletion. Honestly, I'm not sure where Wikipedia's policy would stand on that image. The original images was taken by a NASA satellite, the happy face was added by an anonymous user at 4chan.org, and finally, I made some small edits before uploading it. 8bit (talk) 21:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will this suffice?:

[1]

8bit (talk) 06:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Theatre Vienna

Please restore the above article. As I see it, the article is not entirely promotional, and van be fixed by a little normal editing. I know I could just restore and fix it myself, but I like to ask first. DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Fastily. You have new messages at Kingoomieiii's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

King Öomie 13:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Carlisle United 2-1 Plymouth Argyle (1999)

You deleted the above page yesterday, but the relating AFD remains open, can you do the honours. --Jpeeling (talk) 17:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY ^(TALK) 22:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony field pic

A friend gave me that pic yesterday and seid I could upload it to wikki --Jena (talk) 17:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HI," u deleated the page " india Expo Centre". U said its advertising but when all other convention centres can have a page here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_convention_and_exhibition_centers)then how can mine be an advertising? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinakie (talk • contribs) 00:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

India Expo Centre

u deleated the page " India Expo Centre". U said its advertising but when all other convention centres can have a page here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_convention_and_exhibition_centers)then how can mine be an advertising? I request you to restore the page.

Pinakie