User talk:Tannim1

Administrator Censorship

I herby accuse Luna Santin, Tnxman 310 and jpgordan of engaging in direct violation of Wikipedia open access rules. They refuse to discuss a situation and blocked me because I make politicaly incorrect points.Tannim1 (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, you were blocked as a sockpuppet. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!)} 21:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have not posted in a year. What possible reason other than censorship is there to block me?Tannim1 (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bullshit. Your contributions come from 9/11/09 to today. That's not even a week. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!)} 23:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tannim1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not getting a fair hearing, adminis refuse to investigate

Decline reason:

You are lying through your teeth above. I am investigating, and I'm not impressed by the perjury in this instance. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Tear him for his bad verses!)} 23:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let me be clear, I have not posted in a year since the first post from the history of Tannim1