Jump to content

Talk:Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 99.224.61.118 (talk) at 09:13, 5 October 2009 (clean-up, re-arrange, add reply.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

PEMF Article

This article is full of unproven medical claims, they were made entirely by one or two people and upon trying to find any sources for the page my searching has indicated that they have been pulled from thin air. I'm putting up a neutrality flag, but I may suggest this article is deleted if this isn't cleaned up. Previous unsigned comment by 205.250.105.229(talk) 19:24, 20 September 2009

I could find no unproven claims in this article. All facts were cited using credible sources. Please be specific about which facts require verification. Previous unsigned comment by Kcfrankl(talk|contribs) 21:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Critical thinking scientists, university and college students are usually NOT forbidden the knowledge of electromedicine, and are usually NOT blocked from accessing the Pub Med or nytimes web sites to search for double blind medical studies and information on various (proven) forms of electromedicine. The search for such things can best be performed making use of the Google search engine when using the site:website-name search item. FYI the PubMed site is run by the US NIH and so is supposedly a WP:RS, and so too is the nytimes.
For example searches that you should read the results from include the following:
  1. site:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov "Augmentation of Bone Repair by Inductively Coupled Electromagnetic Fields"
  2. site:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov "Bassett CA" pulsed
  3. site:nytimes.com pulsed OR pulsing magnetic therapy OR treatment OR healing
Are there any key reasons why it was that you could not find this information for yourself?
What in your background and experience prompted you immediately to think that this form of treatment method was quackery? The blind following of monopolistic tycoons who would rather narrow the breadth of human thinking to solutions provided only by corporations that they own and control is a bad plan.
For your edification, you should research (carefully) the claims made here, here, here, here, or here to see if any non-tycoon based sources think that corruption has not set in anywhere in our society, especially the medical science area. 99.224.61.118 (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]