Jump to content

User talk:StJohnTheBaptist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Ajkgordon (talk | contribs) at 10:45, 20 October 2009 (→‎Revert vandalism: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Before writing here, please, remember that you soul may burn in hell for eternity because of you wrote. StJohnTheBaptist (talk)

RE:Is Gaumata Smerdis or not[edit]

Hi, 0. NO, Gaumata is not Smerdis. At least not according to most sources. The debates are 01: what was the real story of that killing. 02. who was Gaumata (and not Bardia). 1. That theory, you mention, is not "alternative". 2. Do not get angry with "hypothetical", because it is. 3. Wikipedia has rules (please see the answer at talk page (specially "POV" policy, yes wikipedia pushes some POV!) 4. I will write an article on that story very soon and my account will include your favorite version, but I will use better sources, if you do not mind. The book you read is good to read but is not really appropriate for Encyclopaedia. 5. Please give me time, I will write that article. Xashaiar (talk) 07:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert vandalism[edit]

Please do NOT accuse me or any other editor of vandalism when it is not, as in this example. If you do not understand what isn't vandalism, then I suggest you read this useful article paying particular attention to the item in the table starting "Reversion or removal of unencyclopedic material..." Thank you. AJKGORDON«» 10:45, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StJohnTheBaptist&oldid=320979715"