Jump to content

User talk:Saltine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robroams (talk | contribs) at 05:20, 27 October 2009 (→Please salt Eric Zaccar). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Filter 238

Is anyone actively monitoring the log for this? Prodego talk 22:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am monitoring the log for it. Why do you ask? Evil saltine (talk) 23:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just clearing out unused, old, and non-worthwhile filters, and came across that one, and I wanted to make sure someone was monitoring it. Prodego talk 02:32, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

from Nawlin's Talk Page

so does that mean that if i put on the wikipedia article a article about the subject from any newspaper or television station (thats notable enough to be listed on wikipedia) that you guys wont delete my page? please resond on my talk page

-jedimaster3410

think i got it

could you do me a huge favor and look at these sites and tell me if they are notable enough so that my article doesnt get deleted again...

www.tomatoturtle.com/morningcall www.tomatoturtle.com/newsreviews (click on 69 News and you can watch the video if you so choose) www.tomatoturtle.com/buckscountyherald

Those are three newpaper/TV stations who did a piece on the subject of my article.....please post your answer on my talk page.....Thanks a lot

-jedimaster3410

Theantinawlin

Just fyi [1]  Chzz  ►  23:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Evil saltine (talk) 06:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

For your help with my userpage. -- Banjeboi 15:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Evil saltine (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

Please stop blocking people without giving fair warning first. You have no reason to believe that they weren't trying to make a good faith edit and accidently made a mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.120.211.137 (talk) 16:37, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty obvious that you're the same person who's been vandalizing User:Pepperpiggle. Evil saltine (talk) 20:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for blocking my evil alter ego, vfp16! We've had serious problems with him on French Wikipedia. Vincent (talk) 01:32, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, lol. Evil saltine (talk) 01:34, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks II

Thank you for cleaning up. ;) This probably made them a bit angry... *hrhr* --Thogo (Talk) 10:18, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh no problem. =) Evil saltine (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sick of mE (band)

  • ah ok well its up there now. i dont care about the images but that text took me forever to come up with and i was too tired to save it. thanks anyway ill be sure that if i do ever post an article on here ill read the guide lines first.Stich666 (talk) 20:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)stich666[reply]
No problem. The email has been sent. Evil saltine (talk) 20:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your expertise requested

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saltine cracker challenge -- please comment. JBsupreme (talk) 20:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, lol =) Evil saltine (talk) 20:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please salt Eric Zaccar

Hello, Saltine … Less that 24 hours after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Zaccar was closed as Delete, one of the sockpuppets - Robroams (talk · contribs) - has recreated it … I've tagged it with {{uw-repost}}, but would you please WP:SALT it? Thnx!

Happy Editing! — 138.88.125.101 (talk · contribs) 00:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I considered salting it, but I hope that won't be necessary. If it gets created again I (or someone else) will. Thanks! Evil saltine (talk) 00:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me what "Salt" means. I re-created the Eric Zaccar article, using more in-depth information and many more checkable references from major newspapers for one reason and one reason alone: I don't want people who google Eric to get a page that says that Eric's article has been deleted, and a link to the long diatribes that bad mouthed him. Again, a lot of money, time and energy has been invested in Eric's new screenplayand upcoming film, it's a very important story that could be a very important movie, and the last thing we need is a poterntial investor, director or star googling him and seeing the negative press that you've recently given him. Better to see nothing at all.

From the impression we "sock puppets" got, you didn't really want to delete Eric's article, you wanted to bring it up to your "standard." That's what I tried to do. It was flagged before anyone could have possibly had a chance to read it. Thank you.

Unless, of course, everything the editors were saying was crap, and you'd planned to delete Eric's article, all along, no matter how much contrary information we offered.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Saltine&oldid=322288361"