Jump to content

User talk:59.141.18.155

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 59.141.18.155 (talk) at 15:16, 18 November 2009 (→‎Borscht). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

rusyn is just the ukrainian word for ruthenian, get a clue. --Львівське (talk) 21:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that, but not you. You try to show Rusyns who do not identify themselves with Ukrainians as the only Ruthenians. Thats your mistake.--59.141.18.155 (talk) 07:04, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That has never once occurred in this article. English not your native language?--Львівське (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Read the article carefully. I hope you can read English. "Ruthenians" is a general term for both Ukrainians and Rusyns. Thus changing "Rusyns" into "Ruthenians" is a logical mistake.--59.141.18.155 (talk) 08:25, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That entirely depends on the context of the sentence. --Львівське (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, it depends on the definition of "Ruthenians". You try to depict Rusyns as Ruthenians without mentioning Ukrainians. Its like depicting people of Kievan Rus as modern Russians...--59.141.18.155 (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What the heck are you talking about? Take a deep breath and READ the edits --Львівське (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm talking about your mistakes. --59.141.18.155 (talk) 18:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please point out a specific mistake I may have made. I have read over the edits by other users, and put forethought into the wording of my additions/editing as well, and fail to see any issues therein. If you can point out maybe a sentence that is incorrect we can rectify the situation. This, however, does not even braze the amount of other edits you are needlessly reverting and lying are vandalism. Why delete fact tags for unreferenced claims/figures? Why revert expansion on the separatist section? Why undo other grammatical fixes? --Львівське (talk) 19:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rusyns. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -FASTILY (TALK) 19:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, seeing how the page is already protected, this notice really isn't applicable anymore. You can go ahead and ignore it. -FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borscht

I have reverted your most recent edit to the Borscht article a second time because it again was unsupported. Please discuss this at the talk page. -Krasnoludek (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:59.141.18.155&oldid=326545725"