Jump to content

Talk:Political media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lomcevak (talk | contribs) at 13:43, 24 November 2009 (Undid revision 311575378 by Willy turner (talk) All very well .. you are reverted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

By the way, the internet is a medium I put high hopes into, else I wouldn´t write this. But the internet is prone to sabotage, because most data flows through a few knots, so if you bomb down, hack or compromise a few of them you can affect 95% of the world´s available data bandwidth, still 80% after a few days of reconfiguration. The state cares for roads to walk, ride and drive on, it should care for the internet, too.

This is exaggeration. Most of bandwidth goes inside countries, not to US and from US, as author seems to think. To destroy 95% of data bandwidth you would have to sabotage many thousands (if not more) of data lines. --Taw

Nearly all american traffic flows over a few knots in NY; London & Paris for Europeean traffic. The "need" to cut costs has lead to a very concentrated picture, the old picture of the decentral ARPAnet is not valid anymore. Grasso

This article should be called "Propaganda organs" and possibly included in the progaganda article. It needs shortening and/or NPOVing. Ed Poor

Who is the author(s)?