Talk:Moldova–European Union relations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Template:European Union

Eastern Europe Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Moldova Start‑class High‑importance

	Moldova portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Moldova, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Moldova on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoldovaWikipedia:WikiProject MoldovaTemplate:WikiProject MoldovaMoldova articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is [1] a reliable source? And is it important enough to be included in this article? (58.188.97.134 12:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Aren't the things written in this article a little too europhile? For example, the situation in Pridnestrovie isn't mentioned at all, and reading Enlargement of the European Union#Moldova, it seems that the situation is somewhat different from what's stated here. I'm adding an NPOV tag on the article page. If anyone disagrees to this, feel free to remove it again. (58.188.97.134 12:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Reducing versus expansion

I prefer expansion rather than reducing the articles. The latest version looks very reduced now. I ask the editors to work to expand and not to cut the papers. --Tones benefit 16:12, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

Any reason pretty much any content added has been reverted or simply deleted? And not a single comment in talk? PētersV 01:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? See "Page history". If you can convert the cut and pasted texts into a summary that does not smell plagiarism and is related to the article title, you are very welcome. `'Míkka 01:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very well aware of page history, after all, that's how I saw all the whittling down to nothing. :-) I had just expected to see some discussion here. If it's simply plagiarism, that should be reasonably simple to remedy. PētersV 01:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This was a piece from a huge mess from this bunch, and not very imoportant to waste any time beyond reverting: just a bunch of newspaper reports about intentions of politicians. Nothing definite, i.e., suitable for wikipedia. If we start adding each and every move of every stateman from USA to Zamunda, it will be one big unreadable shitload of wikipedia. `'Míkka 04:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you have to admire persistence! I need to get to the library in the next week or two for something else, I'll see what I can turn up that's more analysis than pronouncements. PētersV 01:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Names order

This is to mention, that in the bilateral relations boxes, will name first the name of the country itself, and AFTER it the name of the country with relations are discussed in the article. See relative articles {{Foreign relations of Moldova}}.

As example I always bring the German articles. Well, see the Foreign relations of Germany, also {{Foreign relations of Germany}}.

well, Moldo-German and not Germano-Moldovan, in the articles Foreign relations of Moldova, and vice-versa in articles with [[ Foreign relations of Germany...

A general rule can be formed in order do not unusual duplicate the articles.

--serhio ^talk 20:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In all articles like this one, countries' name are written after EU in bilateral relations boxes. Look at these articles please.. Azerbaijan and the European Union, Armenia and the European Union, Ukraine and the European Union, Norway and the European Union, Georgia and the European Union ... --Aegean Boy (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

unificaton with romania movement

maybe worth a mention?