Jump to content

User talk:Golbez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 187.22.194.155 (talk) at 20:35, 17 December 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bifid rib

Where can you see what got deleted?... for the discussion page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifid_rib
Reference
01:03, 21 May 2008 Golbez (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Bifid rib" ‎ (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page)
-- the zak (talk)

Smile!

huh?

Complaint about Notabilitypatrol regarding TBTL

I've also tried to engage Notabilitypatrol on this issue with little luck. Notabilitypatrol's commentary has extended to the TBTL website, where he attempts to disrupt the website's infrastructure and participation through the comments section. Details revealed on the program's website as well as Notabilitypatrol's writing style make clear that he is responsible for some of the bullying occurring on that site. The changes Notabilitypatrol made to the TBTL Wikipedia entry were particularly concerning because they bordered on slanderous.

As I wrote in the TBTL discussion page (some of this is altered with new thoughts, though :)):

If someone links to the audio files from which much of the original content is derived, will you just let it go? I'd like to publicly say, no one is trying to undermine the integrity of Wikipedia as an incredibly useful resource. I think all parties understand the spirit of the site and I think a reasonable person could identify passages on the page that offer "context" and "editorial balance" (by the way one could argue that the information that he added--that had been deleted--was intended specifically to create a negative impression of the show and its host, and that the content did not add editorial integrity).

To tell you the truth, I don't think the program or the host is too concerned about the entry--so if the "powers that be" find that the entry is in violation no one (maybe some fans) will be terribly offended by its deletion. And while I'm not convinced that formal mediation is warranted or necessary, I'm intrigued by the principle of the thing, I value truthfulness, community, and goodwill, and I'm concerned that Notabilitypatrol's editorial additions and his move towards "formal mediation" is an admittedly masterful effort to manipulate Wikipedia's editorial guidelines and principles with malicious intent. Best wishes. MikFantastik (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2009 (EST)

Please remind me?

The warning about my adding "nonesense" is noted, but can you tell me exactly what I did? El Generico

Hello

Finally i am free of the block.

Sorry for my bad behavior and use of profanity.

Because of the blockade, I promise not to vandalize any more article. Actually just wanted to know how you ajem against vandals, since I'm used to the Portuguese Wikipedia.

Eduardo Sellan III (talk, contributions) Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 02:47.

abort retry or iognore

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

Hi. Do you think it is OK that certain users are trying to remove the info about Azerbaijani rayon from the infobox? You can find the same info elsewhere in the article. The very first lines of the article say that the city is a de-jure part of Azerbaijan. I don't think it makes any sense to remove the info about the de-jure status, it must be presented alongside with the de-facto one. Regards, Grandmaster 16:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Answer

I want to know why you deleted the newly-formed article Andressa Oliveira?