Jump to content

User talk:Dragonnas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.62.114.248 (talk) at 17:49, 22 December 2009 (References: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Talk to me baby. I want to know what you're thinkin'.

Saw your comments. That's a very good idea, and we could use you and other editors that are not pro-PRC censors on all the Tibet articles. Right now, they all look a lot like some kind of Xinhua special report. Best of luck and let me know if I can be of assistance. Alexwoods (talk) 19:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! I'm trying to improve the quality of these particular articles so that hopefully there will be an end to the conflicting information and the "government" party line. It's not that I believe the chinese government is lying or untrustworthy, just that all content on Wikipedia must meet certain criteria such as verifiability and proper reference citations, and most chinese government statements on the subject of Tibet are provided without backup evidence or objective sources, and so should not be included. This makes most tibet-related articles seem POV biased, but the reality is that there are many claims being made by many different sources, with no information being offered to back them up. Anyway, thanks for the recognition. Dragonnas (talk) 21:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a discussion Food vs biofuel debate

Hi dear editor. Would you be so kind to visit Talk:Food vs fuel and give us your experienced opinion on that discussion. We need more editors to give their input on the proposed article's name change. Mariordo (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oregon tax revolt

I'm wondering why you made this change to Oregon tax revolt. Measure 5 was a statewide ballot measure, and doesn't have anything to do with the federal government. I believe the original statement wasn't entirely correct either: funding was mostly by levy district, rather than counties, but I'll fix that after I understand what your change. —EncMstr (talk) 17:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By lightening the burden of school funding from the state economy, by default that burden shifts onto the next organization charged with funding schools. The federal government?
I suggest reading Oregon Ballot Measure 5 (1990) to find similar statements not written by myself. I was collaborating the two articles to provide supporting, non-conflicted information.Dragonnas (talk) 17:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

The usual course of action if the vandal is still "live" and they've continued vandalising past their last warning, is to make a request at WP:AIV. One of the friendly admins there will then review the case and possibly block the user. The page is pretty keenly watched by many of us, so you usually get a pretty quick response time.

Thanks for your efforts to keep the encyclopaedia clean! Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

References

Your whole water is wet speech is great. But you need references. Get them or go somewhere else, you're the kind of bottom feeder that is ruining this site.