Jump to content

Talk:E-Verify

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Isprawl (talk | contribs) at 21:40, 26 December 2009 (→‎MULTIPLE ARTICLES!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Stwalkerbot 23:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If E-Verify Were Mandatory for All Employers, It Could Essentially Halt Illegal Immigration

The article contains no hint as to the real potential of E-Verify. If made mandatory for all employers, E-Verify could essentially -- and compassionately -- halt illegal immigration by giving the signal that the era of wink-and-a-nod was over. Removing the employment magnet would be a simple, humane way of fomenting self-deportation for many illegal immigrants. E-Verify is cheap, very highly accurate, and one of the very few tools available to efficiently combat massive illegal immigration. The article should note these things. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.153.18 (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

well, if there are credible sources that state that, find them and add a link. 13:14 26 Decebmer 2009 isprawl

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--Stwalkerbot 23:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain this line please

"The program has also been called inaccurate, though the error rate, currently around 8 percent, is decreasing, as many of the errors came from changing last names after marriage, or not informing the government they were now citizens."
Isn't the government the very entity that naturalizes aliens. So how the government not be aware of this fact? Heliumballoon (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC).[reply]

One part of the article says the error rate is .5%. Another part says it's 8%. "Error rate" is not defined nor its consequences. The DHS addresses this here: http://www.dhs.gov/journal/leadership/2008/05/debunking-e-verify-error-rate.html

173.19.200.183 (talk) 06:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MULTIPLE ARTICLES!

What in the world is this article about: E-verify --68.49.229.110 (talk) 01:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i have merged relevant information from the other article (namely state laws related to e-verify) and have recommended that page fr deletion Isprawl (talk) 21:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]