Jump to content

Talk:Platoon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 203.26.190.4 (talk) at 22:06, 5 January 2010 (→‎Australian platoon organisation: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMilitary history: South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / North America / South America / United States Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
Taskforce icon
British military history task force
Taskforce icon
Canadian military history task force
Taskforce icon
European military history task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
South American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

structure

How is this article organised?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠01:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Armored units

There is no mention of how many vehicles an armored platoon consists of (seems to be a common problem with the "military organization" themed articles on Wikipedia).

Anyway, I always understood a platoon to be about four tanks. I'm not sure if this is universally true or varied from country to country. Someone who knows, please respond so we can include that in the article. 71.32.252.114 (talk) 05:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Australian platoon organisation

Sorry, but can someone please come along and remove the shoddy work done in the australian section? It is not only incorrect, but very poorly written. the wording makes little sense and is outdated in many forms. Im not a registered user and dont have the fully correct information, so I cant and wont edit myself, but attention should be draw to these errors