User talk:Nick Fitzpatrick

== New user ==

Hi Nick, I hope you don't mind me asking but you clearly are not a new user, would you care to declare any other accounts you may have? Thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any other current accounts. I used to edit with an account, then took a break, forgot the password to it, so edited with an IP for a while. I realized there's too many things I can't do as an IP, so I registered a new account. Nick Fitzpatrick (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to declare the name of that account? Off2riorob (talk) 15:17, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:127 Nick Fitzpatrick (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you openness. Off2riorob (talk) 16:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed content

It matters not if the content is in another source, please do not put it back without comfirmation that it is ok to be used. Off2riorob (talk) 15:12, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out to you that I am totally available and open to discussion, there is no need to repeatedly put things in if they are disputed, the citations can be discussed and the is the reliable sources noticeboard, there is no hurry and no reason at all the have revert wars. Off2riorob (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I feel the same, and won't edit war over this. Nick Fitzpatrick (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually quite liking those two citations and do not think you need to take them to the RS noticeboard. Off2riorob (talk) 16:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
great, thanks, you just saved me a bunch of typing... Nick Fitzpatrick (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good, I am not into censorship and only in my small way trying to keep it clean and I would not dispute perfectly good citations which these appear to be and would have been embarrassed to be responsible for you taking then to the RS board. I would like to see a balanced comment of this detail included. Off2riorob (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree. The article should not make him look like a Mossad agent or anything, but it should explain his invlovement in Operation Mural, which I think is a big part of his notability. Nick Fitzpatrick (talk) 16:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do still however have issues with the previous citation that went to the RS noticeboard and is so far the only citation that includes the award, I would ask that if you do want to use that detail that you get support for its inclusion, perhaps by taking the new details and supporting citations back to the noticeboard and see if altogether it is now usable just for the award, myself I don't think it is usable but I am no expert, so be bold, write something, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]