Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Floquenbeam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Majorly (talk | contribs) at 16:29, 15 January 2010 (Alison's review of my previous account). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Editing stats, using User:X!'s tool: http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/Floquenbeam

General user info

Username: Floquenbeam
User groups: rollbacker
First edit: Aug 13, 2008 19:16:22
Unique articles edited: 1,484
Average edits per page: 2.40
Total edits (including deleted): 3,565
Deleted edits: 107
Live edits: 3,458
Namespace totals

Article	1224	35.40%
Talk	126	3.64%
User	163	4.71%
User talk	1095	31.67%
Wikipedia	745	21.54%
Wikipedia talk	84	2.43%
File	4	0.12%
Template	14	0.40%
Template talk	2	0.06%
Category	1	0.03%

Month counts

2008/08	20	
2008/09	33	
2008/10	19	
2008/11	9	
2008/12	26	
2009/01	0	
2009/02	116	
2009/03	167	
2009/04	144	
2009/05	87	
2009/06	304	
2009/07	314	
2009/08	326	
2009/09	488	
2009/10	446	
2009/11	419	
2009/12	380	
2010/01	160	
Logs

Accounts created: 2
Pages moved: 13
Top edited articles

Article

25 - HP_Newquist
24 - Emmanuel_Adebayor
18 - Structural_engineering
18 - Harlem_Renaissance
14 - Bridge
14 - Midget
13 - Racism
12 - Animal_Farm
12 - First_Transcontinental_Railroad
10 - Utopia

Talk

10 - 2009_Jupiter_impact_event
10 - Names_for_U.S._citizens
8 - Main_Page
5 - Rorschach_test
4 - Grief_porn
4 - Western_culture
4 - 2009_Great_Britain_and_Ireland_floods
3 - The_Secret_of_NIMH_2:_Timmy_to_the_Rescue
3 - Diablo_Cody
3 - Ribbon_(computing)

User

40 - Floquenbeam
24 - Floquenbeam/DPWL_Workbench
17 - Floquenbeam/Sandbox
12 - Floquenbeam/monobook.js
7 - Floquenbeam/SE_Workbench
5 - Floquenbeam/Emergency_backup_sandbox
5 - Floquenstein's_monster
4 - X!/RfX_Report
4 - Zzyzx11/Archive23
3 - Lord_Wikipedian_of_the_Wiki

User talk

154 - Floquenbeam
17 - Xeno
16 - Pedro
14 - Floquensock
9 - Delicious_carbuncle
8 - Drew_R._Smith
8 - Equazcion
7 - Sandbox_for_user_warnings
7 - Domino79
7 - Alison

Wikipedia

157 - Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents
126 - Main_Page/Errors
63 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
53 - Administrators'_noticeboard
46 - Help_desk
33 - Wikiquette_alerts
24 - New_contributors'_help_page
19 - Introduction
18 - Village_pump_(technical)
10 - Requests_for_page_protection

Wikipedia talk

12 - Administrators'_noticeboard
12 - Requests_for_adminship
6 - Vetting_process
5 - Today's_featured_article
4 - Disambiguation_pages_with_links
4 - Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard
4 - WikiProject_LGBT_studies
4 - Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
4 - WikiProject_Disambiguation
3 - WikiProject_U.S._Supreme_Court_cases

File

1 - Shinhwa_-_TOP.jpg
1 - JabbatheHuttPlayset.jpg
1 - Where_The_Wild_Things_Are.jpg
1 - Beate-Uhse-Turm.JPG

Template

4 - Socialism_sidebar
2 - Poem
2 - Split_message
1 - RfA
1 - Philip_K._Dick
1 - Ethics
1 - TV_channel_categories
1 - Db-vandalism-notice
1 - Db-attack-notice

Template talk

1 - Solar_System
1 - Jamaica_Squad_2009_CONCACAF_Gold_Cup

Category

1 - Channel_11_TV_stations_in_Canada


Executed in 0.28 seconds
Taken 0.91 megabytes of memory to execute.

Alison's review of my previous account

Hi all. I am aware of Floquenbeam's previous Wikipedia account, as well as its full history going back some years. The previous account was abandoned solely for privacy concerns. I've been aware of these concerns for some time and I know them to have been well-founded. Ok - from examining the previous account, I can state the following:

  1. The previous account had a pristine block log.
  2. There were no ArbCom clashes that I can find, nor any sanctions ever imposed.
  3. Editing was uncontroversial and largely wikignomish. Plenty of janitorial work was carried out.
  4. The editor abandoned the account in very good standing, and under uncontroversial circumstances. They just upped and left it.

My overall impression of this editor was of a kind and co-operative editor, a non-BITEy editor, and a good team player overall. This was a person who didn't get into edit-wars nor POV-pushed in any way. In fact, I would normally Support this RFA, though I will recuse in this instance - Alison 02:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have questions for you.
  1. How long had the previous account lasted? (e.g some months, some years)
  2. Does the previous account have any overlapped period with the current account or other accounts if there were any?
  3. Did the candidate previously run for Adminship? (this question was also made by JeyHenry)
  4. What does mean by "a pristine block log"? You mean the candidate has no block log?
  5. Can you clarify the "privacy concern"? Is it related to "real name" or "harassment" by his/her opponents?
  6. You said the candidate had no ArbCom clashes, but what about AN/ANI/WQA clashes?
  7. Why did you say "In fact, I would normally Support this RFA, though I will recuse in this instance" if you don't want to weight in your position as a neutral Checkuser? --Caspian blue 16:12, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Floquenbeam has already indicated he does not wish to answer these kind of questions, which should be on the main RFA page, not here. In any case, a pristine block log obviously means one with no entries. I don't understand how you could possibly interpret it to mean anything else. As for the rest of the questions, I'll leave it up to Floquenbeam to decide whether to answer them, but he has indicated that answering them, giving hints to information could lead stalkers to the name of the account, which is undesirable. Please think about what purpose you're achieving by asking these questions. Majorly talk 16:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]