Jump to content

User talk:Wine Guy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pea12345 (talk | contribs) at 10:53, 19 January 2010 (→‎nested parameter). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to Wine Guy's talk page!

•If you post a message here, I will respond here unless you ask me to do otherwise.
•If I've left a message on your talk page, feel free to respond there; I'm watching it.   


•Please add new messages at the bottom, or just click here to start a new section.
Have a _______ day! (insert your preferred type of day)


hi there

You are an interesting person. Anelcsarasan (talk) 08:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


What's UP

I like your userbox: This user utilizes advanced amounts of alcohol. That's pretty funny. You have, as listed above a sweet personality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElioDelRIo (talk • contribs) 04:26, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks! And yes, that userbox is a fav of mine, quite accurate too; I've been a professional drinker for a long time. If you'd like to use it, it's available here: {{User:UBX/Alcohol-3}} Cheers!Wine Guy Talk 07:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash

An editor has nominated 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. - Eastmain (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, but my only "contribution" to the article was to revert vandalism [1] while doing RC patrol. WP:AfD#Notifying_interested_people suggests: ...it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion. Do not notify bot accounts, people who have made only insignificant 'minor' edits...", I should think that I fall into this category. This isn't a criticism or complaint, just a suggestion that might save you time when making AfD notifications. Cheers! Wine Guy Talk 01:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite right. Thanks for reverting the vandalism there. - Eastmain (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS - I should note that I think the article should unquestionably be speedily kept, and having gone to the discussion page to say that, I find it's already been done. If only all decisions at AfD went so easily! Wine Guy Talk 01:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fianna Fail and Oscar Traynor

Dear Wine Guy,

Why did you change wikipedia entry on Oscar Traynor? I added information about his involvement in the Rose Tattoo case which I think is of huge historic interest. Why do you delete it? The article calls the man a revolutionary. There is nothing revolutionary about shooting policemen in the back of their heads and then joining a cabinet that protected paedophiles and shut down plays that they perceived went against the teachings of a papacy.

Secondly why did you change my edit of Fianna Fail and how dare you call it vandalism? They do have a history of corruption. That is simply fact. Two of their TDs have gone to jail in the last ten years. Their former leader, Charles Haughey, was instrumental in setting up the provisional IRA, smuggled arms to Northern Ireland and is documented as receiving thousands of pounds in bribes. I haven't even gone into their disgraceful relationship with the banks and developers. I say on my page that they had a deferential attitude to the catholic church. Again this is fact. They consistently voted against contraceptive and divorce and most recently the Ryan Commission on child abuse explicitly stated that the department of education showed a deferential attitude toward the Catholic church. Since FF have been in power for most of the the 20th century it is reasonable to say that the dep. of education for most of this period has been run by FF ministers. They were also the political party to bring in a ban on the sale of tampons in the 1940s. The minister behind this was Con Ward. He did this after the bishops raised concerns about the tampons effects on young girls morality.

Regards,

Andrew —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewlegge (talk • contribs) 01:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the following: Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Once you have read those, if you still have any questions, let me know. Wine Guy Talk 02:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nested parameter

Hi. I would like to inform you that |nested= is not anymore used. Banners are automatically nested when inside {{WPBS}}. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 00:05, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks for the note. Wine Guy Talk 00:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks Wine Guy for the explanation and links. Much appreciated. I will review. Best regardsPea12345 (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wine_Guy&oldid=338732289"