Jump to content

Talk:Autosurf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 204.50.116.10 (talk) at 18:34, 5 January 2006 (→Problems with this article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Autosurfs are ponzi scams, and I was surprised that there was no mention of them being so. This article was not factual and promoted illegal programs, so I edited it to be truthful.

Take note that not all autosurfs are ponzi schemes. You are obviously biased, which is against Wikipedia's policy of neutrality. And next time please end with your signature. - yxTay 14:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The definition that I personally saw made by you was incredibly biased. Autosurfs like ST and 12DP are illegal in the U.S. and you did not even mention the incredible amount of controversy on the internet regarding this. This is not biased, it's just honest. Please leave it this way, thanks.

Not all autosurfs are ponzis. Investment autosurfs, in which the article refers to, definitely are though. The fact that this article does not even reference the fact that they are ponzis and illegal in the U.S. is misleading and I will be editing it soon. I also noticed you are an autosurf member and include your referral link on your page, so you are clearly going to try and edit the page as well. Please leave it this way to reflect truth. Devero

I understand what you're trying to say, there are many autosurfs which are actually ponzis in disguise. But there's no need to claim all autosurfs as ponzis, remove tons of relevant data and edit an external link to scam.com. Moreover, what you're talking about are regarding paid autosurfs. That's different from autosurfs (not paid). You may want to add a sub heading for paid autosurfs. - yxTay 02:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the edits done by Devero is incredibly biased. I personally think that the earlier article has already explained both pros and cons about autosurf and I was surprised that Devero claimed the article 'never mention about them being ponzi scams', when in fact it did - Anon

Check the revision history; there used to be mention of this being a ponzi scam. But people pushing this scam on message boards are editing this article to make it look like Wikipedia is backing up their claims! Just do a quick google of autosurf mentions on message boards and you will see what I mean. This article needs to be brought under control. - Eric

Problems with this article

This article is:

  1. badly written
  2. appears to violate NPOV

Marking as such. -- Anon.


My complaint would be the usage of the word "newbie". - Chocobean

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Autosurf&oldid=34002105"