Jump to content

User talk:Bloodleech

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sp0 (talk | contribs) at 17:30, 6 February 2010 (talk about nootropic article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bloodleech, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Agoraphobia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 10:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

please don't mess up nootropic

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Wikipedia:Rules#Content_changes

What you did makes people looking for information not to have information. IE, I do not see how making "nootropic" into something blank results in providing people with knowledge; rather, DELETING and STARTING an article AGAIN turns knowledge into something like nothing again.

Anyways, the point is for a "major edit"/ie, deleting and starting an article afresh you need a DISCUSSION and VOTE before proceeding to make major changes. Otherwise people will RIGHTFULLY panic -- like they ought to in defense-- unless you mean something else by "panic." I mean orderly panic if not EXTREME defensive of knowledge and sustainment of furthering knowledge and spread of knowledge type of panic. IE, panic that is more planned is better; however, any panic is "okay" I guess as long as I don't start cursing or something, I suppose.