Talk:Medical billing
reconsideration
I would like for a neutral party to reconsider adding www.medbillingforum.com to the medical billing page. I added this before reading or (finding) the guidelines for links. It is a well constructed site, commited to helping medical billers gain information that can help them in their career. There is no fee or membership required. The onlytime a membership is required is if a person would like to contribute to a discussion, reading discussions and learning from them is registration free.
Thanks for any help on this matter.
Joe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Medbilling (talk • contribs) 17:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Question on Content
It seems to me that this content should be strictly a description of Medical Billing and should not seek to describe or define terms unless they are being defined according to unbiased third parties. I would like some feedback from others on this who have more experience in a wikipedia rework. This page is needing some attention. Jpittman 17:39, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Verification and Additional Sources Needed
All of these terms were moved off the page and need to be either placed into sections and/or verified using outside sources. Links that are advertisements for software companies/portals of 'certification or education'/other storefronts don't count.
What is needed here is some hard and fast data either from insurance companies or the government to really solidify these terms.
(copyvios, e.g. from http://www.microtrain.net/mod.php?mod=calendar&op=list_events&sortby=category&cat_id=84, removed by Melchoir 01:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC))
GP's companion software....
- http://www.hcn.net.au/products/pracsoft/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.64.214.234 (talk) 07:49, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
--222.64.214.234 (talk) 08:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)