User talk:Giggs for Temporary

This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a user page or subpage requested to be deleted by its user. Note that in some cases such pages may need to be retained for administrative purposes. Before deleting, administrators are advised to check the contribution history of such pages to be sure they are not deleting a user talk page that has been moved. See CSD U1. Rm

If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice.

Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion.
This page was last edited by Giggs for Temporary (contribs | logs) at 06:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC) (14 years ago)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giggs for Temporary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said don't vandal my talk page. It has been indicated as a part of a reason why blocked me. Only one vandalism is made and being the only reason of blocking. It is too sensitive enough and unfair.

Decline reason:

I couldn't really understand your argument. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giggs for Temporary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't think the block is justified. I just did only one wrong thing and got blocked, and the accuse of "the account only for vandalism" is absolutely a fabricated charge - as the blocker said that "If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely." However I have to apologize for being the first one to vandal the today's featured article, making the others followed me.

Decline reason:

April Fools' Day is not an excuse for vandalism to articles, as you did here. Since this appears to be an alternate account of yours, I'm going to block it indefinitely now, as good-hand/bad-hand sockpuppetry is not permitted here. Edit - and appeal from - your main account. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Congratulations, you've won the Wiki-lottery!

Just kidding, you haven't. Happy April Fools!

In all seriousness, the fact that it is April Fool's Day is not a license to vandalize the encyclopedia as you said you would do here and as you have been doing (e.g. this to the Featured Article for today. You've earned a 48 hour break from editing. If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention that if you want to appeal this block, just add {{unblock|Your reason here}} to your talk page and someone will be along to review the block. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]