User talk:Coramandel23

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Narsapurlutheran.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMG 1372.JPG. The copy called Image:IMG 1372.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion and continued sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 04:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was creating new accounts was because every account I created was being blocked, this is despite the fact that I have been making significant contributions to the talk page and discussion through my so called "socks". I have also refrained from any type of edit warring. I hope the administrators will take an uninterested stand and promote divergent view points. Please unblock at least one account. I have much to contribute to wikipedia. Thank you

Decline reason:

That does not excuse dodging your block, regardless of the merits of it. The proper recourse in that case would have been to file an unblock request, not create a sock (since the latter tends to destroy, or at the very least badly damage, any hope of getting yourself unblocked). —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 06:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of this. I am a new user-I was online since 2007 but I only started contributing recently. Unfortunately I chose a very controversial subject. So please consider it once again

Decline reason:

When you created your very first account, you were required to confirm that you read and understood the username policy, and the WP:MULTIPLE section is part of that policy. WP:EVADE now applies - and if you had read WP:GAB when first blocked, you would have known that too. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What are my other options if you are not willing to unblock even a single account? How will I ever be able to edit Wikipedia?

Decline reason:

Ok, let's break this down:

Stop evading your original block by creating new accounts
Go back to your original account and add an unblock request to it's talk page
If you are blocked from doing that, send an email to arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org explaining your situation.
Given that you have created multiple accounts, you may want to consider the standard offer to blocked users as an avenue to getting unblocked eventually. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only engaged in edit warring in one instance and I really would like to contribute further to Wikipedia. Please consider all the contributions and new articles that I have initiated. I admit that I have erred but don't everybody deserve a chance. Like I said I wasn't aware how things worked around here. All along I thought you could create new accounts(given the emphasis Wikipedia places on anonymity) as long as you made good contributions. Now I know better

Decline reason:

One unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

coramandel23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

One issue at a time please. You were told how to deal with your SOCK issue. Once you have successfully done that and been unblocked, a request for name change can possibly occur. Right now you're blocked for WP:SOCK, and you'll stay thatway until you follow Beeblebrox' advice above. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been involved in a very controversial dispute and my username is my last name. I have a very uncommon last name and my IP address also has been made public. I fear for my safety so kindly consider my case and change my username. Thank you.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

coramandel23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

not neededed, request rename carried out — Peter 18:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I am not trying to evade the sock issue. I have already cited my privacy reasons. I have not engaged in any controversial disputes with this account which bears my last name. I do not wish to be involved in Wikipedia anymore. I only wish you would unblock me for an hour so that I can put in a name change request. I would be happier if an administrator could change my username even while I am blocked. That is all I want and it is an earnest request. I hope you would be considerate.

This request has been forwarded to the people who can handle it. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of declined unblocked requests

Per WP:BLANKING you may not remove declined unblock requests from your talk page while you are still blocked. Please do not remove them while you are still blocked. Continuing to do so will result in your talk page access to be disabled. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username changed

Per your request, your username has been changed as you requested. I trust that you will no longer be editing under this or any other name for the foreseeable future. If after a significant time away from Wikipedia you wish to try a fresh start, a request may be submitted via e-mail to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]