Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zingostar

ÅlandÖland

ÅlandÖland (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Please note that a case was originally opened under Zingostar (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ÅlandÖland. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ÅlandÖland.

Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

Suspected sock puppets/Zingostar

13 June 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

Matrix17 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Evidence submitted by KzKrann (talk)

Blocked on swedish wikipedia as a sockpuppet of many users there. Among these Matrix17, Sirapextra, Vermont etc. KzKrann (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties See Defending yourself against claims.

I have no connection to this other sockpuppet. I have done only creative edits on English Wikipedia. This is obivously a case of someone having the same name on another Wikipedia. Also isnt it true that bad behaviour on one Wikipedia and blocking doesnt apply to all other wikipedias until a "crime" is committed?, i am quite new on Wikipedia so i dont know. You will find that I and Matrix17 dont share the same IP.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think your as you seems very interested of swedish events, writes much about Swedish people, found your way to AFD very fast e.t.c. this is a very obvious case. KzKrann (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I personally only have created this account on english wikipedia that I have right now. I cant speak for the rest of my family that shares this IP but i cant imagine that any vandal accounts are registered to this IP adress in any case shape or form.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When this discussion is closed I will apply for a change of my user name on the appropriate section, so I dont get mixed with this other user.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 14:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Matrix17 (talk · contribs) is not registered, Sirapextra (talk · contribs) has not edited on enwiki, and Vermont (talk · contribs) is not SUL'd. Any evidence of abusing multiple accounts on this wiki? T. Canens (talk) 04:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Matrix 17 (note the space) is registered, but has not edited either. Without any evidence of misbehavior and/or socking, I recommend this be closed. TNXMan 15:51, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do find it concerning that the user seems to be denying that they and the svwiki blocked sock are not the same user. They are, per SUL. But it's not really a blockable offense on its own. I can't find a list of Matrix17 socks on svwiki. If such a list is provided, we can go through it and determine if there has been abusive use of multiple accounts on this wiki. T. Canens (talk) 15:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good reasoning. KzKrann, can you help us out with this? TNXMan 16:30, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I dont understand, if Matrix17 hasnt been used here. How can this be called vandalism. And as long as I with my account doesnt make vandalism (which i havent), I dont see any problem.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 16:35, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non of the so called sockpuppet accounts have been used here. And as pointed out before any offences made on another Wikipedia doesnt make it right for a block on all wikipedias. But i dont know as i am quite new.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 16:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a note at svwiki for the admin who originally blocked Matrix17 there. T. Canens (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I still dont see any connections between this account and those. This IP will not match any accounts as I havent made them. Cheers.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isnt it also true that an account not making any vandalism shouldnt really be blocked?. It seems to be a very weak case and I should get the benifit of not being blocked no matter what.--ÅlandÖland (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]