User talk:DaBiggman

COMPROMISE OVER MATERIAL IN DISPUTE

Hello, I have compromised with you regarding the Shadow People article by including the details of your third paragraph into the body of the main paragraph. However, I left out any details that do not correlate with the vast majority of the phenomena. I have read about 50 personal accounts from various websites and books and never heard of a "Mark of the Shadow" before you mentioned it.

I find your experiences you detailed on the talk page to be fascinating, but they should not be part of on an encyclopedia article because they are not objective. The article is a description of a phenomena meaning it is a summary of what the majority of people claim to witness. The "phenomena" does exist. However it exists in much the same sense as Elvis sightings exist. Meaning that its credibility is not in its scientific basis but in its sociological and psychological signifance.

Perhaps you should find an outlet for your creative writing. I encourage you in this, however if you make additions that are not POV I will remove them as per Wikipedia regultion. Remember, that I have compromised with you and added material to the main body that correlates with your acount.ScifiterX 11:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me David, or should I say Paul, why exactly are you so hell bent on destroying this article because you can't seem to grasp that not every part of what creates this phenomena has yet to be recorded. Why don't you just stick with the anime and comics and leave the supernatural to us loons. Those people that have been scarred by these creatures know what I speak of, because THEY are the ones who told me. The Mark of the Shadow can be referenced in the "Book of Shadows" which is currently available at the Vatican Archive if you can speak Latin. It has very detailed subject material involving the "Shadows that walk."