User talk:66.90.148.162

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept material that is not supported by sources that pass our Reliable Sources policy, as with the previously removed material that you restored in the Ron Marz article. A reliable source must be some person or organization generally accepted as a valid authority on the subject matter, and/or which have some type of credentialing process or editorial oversight over the content. Posts on message boards by people not considered such an authority are not considered reliable sources. Moreover, the link cited for that content, doesn't even lead to a post, but merely a message board directory.

In addition, the same term should not be wikilinked more than once in the same section, yet you reverted that as well.

If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

That edit summary made me laugh, which I desperately needed. Thanks for that and nice changes. Happy editing. Millahnna (mouse)talk 00:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. I'm halfway expecting some sock-puppeted admin to pop up here before the day is out trying to ban me just because of that summary, totally ignoring the fact that the edits were valid. Been a *lot* of that around Wikipedia the past few years, sad to say. User:66.90.148.162 00:09, 13 August 2010

...Apparently someone calling themselves "Nightscream" has decided to play Wikinazi on me. Most likely he's reverted all the tweaks I've done on other pages, so I'll have to go back and see what sort of vandalism he's committed. This is one of the reasons I probably should quit editing errors that I find here, as there's always some troll who's more interested in picking on people and playing power trip games than doing what's right to keep Wikipedia at least halfway credible as a resource.

Please stop blanking this talk page, and stop violating Wikipedia's Civility policy by engaging in name-calling. I have no interest in any of the other work you've done in other articles, though this talk page will retain an accurate record of the messages left on it, as it is not your personal talk page. If you want one, sign in for an account. Someone is not a "Nazi" or "troll" simply because they level legitimate criticism or point out breaches of policy, nor does effecting changes constitute "vandalism", a "power trip", "stalking", or "harassment". If you wish to continue editing here, please respect the site's rules, including ones regarding personally attacking other editors, which I would point out, are as important to maintaining the site's credibility as a resource as any other. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're obviously stalking me, considering how quick you're reverting things. It's Wikinazis - yes, you're a Wikinazi, as demonstrated by your stalkin - that keep me from going ahead and registering an account to do serious edits from. I don't want to put up with the stalking and harassment that you and your ilk foist on *normal* people trying to help make Wikipedia at least halfway credible a resource. When Wikipedia's detractors complain about how "the inmates run the asylum", they're talking about abusers like you.

Either way, you've made your points and you've had your trolling fun. Now leave me alone and go harass someone else, because other than continuing to blank your previous harassment, I've had the last I'll say on this. 00:20, 14 August 2010 66.90.148.162

The speed at which I reverted your edits is derived from the fact that I was editing articles on my Watchlist, and saw your revert after refreshing it. The notion that the only possibility for this is "stalking" is false, and your knee-jerk insistence that it is is due to your own disposition rather than any action on my part, as is your arbitrary use of words like "abuser" or "Nazi". Whether you like it or not, if you visit someone else's website, it is your responsibility to follow their rules, or leave, rather than acting as if anyone who points out these rules to you when you violate them is someone committing some type of transgression against you.

This is your final warning. The next time you violate WP:Civility, WP:No personal attacks or WP:Assume Good Faith by engaging in name-calling or false accusations, or any other type of disruptive editing, such as treating this IP talk page as if it's your own by blanking past messages on it, you will be blocked from editing. Nightscream (talk) 00:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You realize that by threatening to ban me, you've proven my claims that you *are* stalking me *AND* abusing any admin rights you possess? And one other thing, Phil - a *true* Christian wouldn't stalk and harass. Or would they?

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.