Jump to content

Dahiya doctrine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.17.238.199 (talk) at 18:18, 31 August 2010 (Added UN definition, some clean-up). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Dahiya doctrine is a concept said to be used in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) regarding asymmetric warfare in an urban setting, according to which a conventional army targets civilian infrastructure that is used by terrorists.[1] However, the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict describes it as, "the application of disproportionate force and the causing of great damage and destruction to civilian property and infrastructure, and suffering to civilian populations."[2] Richard Goldstone questioned the doctrine himself when referring to its effects during the Gaza conflict, saying, "If that isn’t collective punishment, what is?"[3] The concept is named after a district in southern Beirut[4] where the IDF bombed large apartment buildings which were being used as command-and-control centers by Hizbullah during the 2006 Lebanon War.[1]

Israeli journalist Yaron London opined in 2008 that the Dahiya strategy or doctrine "will become entrenched in our security discourse" following the Iranian takeover of Lebanon and the mobilization of the latter country's entire social infrastructure in support of Hizbullah. London regretted that the doctrine had not taken hold following Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon or Israel's disengagement from Gaza. He also argued that the strategy "is the customary doctrine adopted by most Arabs", who view 'Zionists' as criminals, yet regard all of Israel’s citizens as 'Zionists'.[5]

The 2009 Goldstone report argued that IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot "expressed the premise of the doctrine" in remarks made in 2008. He said: "What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases. [...] This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved."[6][7]

A 2009 report by the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel defines the doctrine thus: "The military approach expressed in the Dahiye Doctrine deals with asymmetrical combat against an enemy that is not a regular army and is embedded within civilian population; its objective is to avoid a protracted guerilla war. According to this approach Israel has to employ tremendous force disproportionate to the magnitude of the enemy’s actions." The report further argues that the doctrine was fully implemented during Operation Cast Lead.[8]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Yaakov Katz, Analysis: The Dahiya Doctrine vs. the Goldstone Report, Jerusalem Post 25-01-2010
  2. ^ Human Rights in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories, Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict | p.24
  3. ^ http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2009/1106/at-brandeis-goldstone-defends-un-war-crimes-report
  4. ^ The Self-Fulfilling Dahiya Doctrine
  5. ^ "Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders’ acts" The Dahiya strategy, according to IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot. Interview in Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.06.08.
  6. ^ Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict (September 15, 2009). "HUMAN RIGHTS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES" (PDF). The Guardian. Retrieved 2009-09-15.
  7. ^ "From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases" Israel warns Hizbullah war would invite destruction, Maj.-Gen. Eisenkot tells Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.03.08
  8. ^ "No Second Thoughts" The Public Committee Against Torture in Israel