Jump to content

Homeland Security Act of 2002

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AutoGeek (talk | contribs) at 00:33, 18 September 2010 (→‎External links: Adding pages to category for a trial and minor tweaks using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Homeland Security Act (HSA) of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135 (Nov. 25, 2002), introduced in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, created the United States Department of Homeland Security in the largest federal government reorganization since the Department of Defense was created via the National Security Act of 1947 (as amended in 1949). The HSA includes many of the organizations under which the powers of the USA PATRIOT Act are exercised. Among other things, it created the new cabinet-level position of Secretary of Homeland Security.

The new department assumed a large number of services, offices and other organizations previously conducted in other departments, such as the Customs Service, Coast Guard, and U.S. Secret Service. It superseded, but did not replace the Office of Homeland Security, which retained an advisory role. The Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2004 provided the new department its first funding.

The Act is similar to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorist Prevention Act (IRTPA) in reorganizing and centralizing Federal security functions to meet post-cold war threats and challenges. Like IRTPA, there are some inherent contradictions in the bill not solved by reorganization. These reflect compromises with other committees needed to secure passage, but the result is at times inconsistent or conflicting authorities. For example, the Act identifies DHS's first responsibility as preventing terrorist attacks in the United States, but the law's language makes clear that investigation and prosecution of terrorism remains with the FBI and assigns DHS only an analytical and advisory role in intelligence activities. Similarly, with critical infrastructure protection, the Act gave DHS broad responsibility to minimize damage but only limited authority to share information and to coordinate the development of private sector best practices.