Jump to content

Talk:List of Intel Pentium 4 processors

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aluvus (talk | contribs) at 02:04, 12 October 2010 (→‎Possible Missing Processor: already there). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Merging Intel processor confusion into this

Should the Pentium 4 stuff from Intel processor confusion be moved into here? That'd mean adding additional columns for the fab technology, power, presence of EIST, presence of EM64T support, presence of XD bit, hyperthreading support, and virtualization (or perhaps with all the various technologies given as a list of items). If all the stuff from that page is moved into x86 processor list pages, that page could be removed. Guy Harris 21:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and it's been done. Guy Harris 02:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Multiplier etc.

A (link to an) explanation of terms like "multiplier" (and possibly "frequency") would be wonderful!

Processor missing in list

Hi!

Im not used to editing wikipages so if someone could add RK80532PC072512 SL7EY to the list? Its a 2.8 GHz 400 FSB P4 and the fastest 400 FSB cpu available. More info at Intel http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL7EY

/Thomas —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.216.134.192 (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

SL6S9 (Intel Pentium 4 2.4 GHz) is missing too: http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?spec=SL6S9 Cutxo (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Missing Processor

Apparently, there may exist a 3.0GHz 400MHz FSB Northwood CPU, being faster than the believed to be fastest 400MHz FSB Pentium4 CPU rated at 2.8GHz.

http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-INTEL-PENTIUM-4-P4-3-0-512-400-SL74Q-2-8Ghz-SL7EY_W0QQitemZ270156442588QQcmdZViewItem

It's s-spec is SL74Q which does turn up some hits on Google. Nothing on Intel's site though. Maybe it was a very short lived and change of plans processor. I won't add it in myself since it's just an eBay link and a rumor as proof, but I'm tossing this out there since I've heard much about it. The guys at the Dell forums have loosely referenced that CPU ocassionaly, sinc ealot of people with old socket 478 Dell's would come in asking for the maximum upgrade possible.

http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/search?submitted=true&type=message&q=3GHz+400FSB&page_size=10&x=0&y=0

If that link fails to work right, on Dell's forums, search for the phrase "3GHz 400FSB" exactly (without the quotes). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.30.238.96 (talk) 20:46, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

what about this processor: http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27441 . is it also missing? 79.209.74.185 (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To the second editor, that is already listed on this page under the SL6D8 sSpec. — Aluvus t/c 02:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EM64T Confusion

This article states that the Pentium-4 541 supports Intel EM64T (64-bit computing). But this [1] spec from Intel states otherwise. Problem is, I've seen a boxed CPU of this type and the Labeling stated that it supported EM64T. Who is correct? And are there any other such CPU models that come with this confusion? --124.43.228.59 15:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intel is prone to typos from time to time, all 5x1 sequence processors support extended memory 64 technology.Coldpower27 15:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]