Jump to content

Talk:Simple Service Discovery Protocol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hamiltont (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 12 October 2010 (SSDP uses ports 2869 and 1900). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconComputing Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

SSDP uses ports 2869 and 1900

Dear all,

as per [Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 832017 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;832017], aka "Service overview and network port requirements for the Windows Server system", SSDP uses ports 2869 and 1900. 2869 is for SSDP event notification, while 1900 is for SSDP other uses.

There's even an SSDP legacy event notification, at port 5000.

All the best,
--Hgfernan (talk) 22:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Example of what network traffic looks like?

It seems that the packets look like HTTP, but with method "M-SEARCH". On my network I see the following information (with a destination port of 1900, which seems to be the standard port for 'SSDP') in a very HTTP protocolish manner (key/value headers and newlines):

M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1
Host:239.255.255.250:1900
ST:urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:InternetGatewayDevice:1
Man:"ssdp:discover"
MX:3

I don't know enough about this topic to feel comfortable adding the section myself, I would prefer not to post incorrect information

Crabpot8 (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]