Bill 99

An Act respecting the exercise of the fundamental rights and prerogatives of the Québec people and the Québec State (Bill 99) (R.S.Q., c. E-20.2) (French: Loi sur l'Exercice des droits fondamentaux et des prérogatives du peuple québécois et de l'État du Québec, L.R.Q. c. E-20.2) is a Quebec law passed in opposition and in contradiction with the federal Clarity Act (S.C. 2000, c. 26). The Act was introduced by Joseph Facal to the National Assembly of Quebec in emergency on 15 December 1999, two days after the introduction of Bill C-20 before the Canadian House of Commons. It was adopted on 7 December 2000, by a majority of 69 against 41.

Whereas the federal act states that, in the case of a referendum about the secession of a Canadian province, the House of Commons has the power to determine afterwards whether the question was clear enough and whether the obtained majority was large enough for the result to be accepted, the provincial one stipulates that Quebecers could opt for the secession of Quebec State by obtaining a simple majority of votes in a referendum. Both acts are mandates given to their respective governments.

The motivating force behind passage of the Act respecting the exercise of the fundamental rights and prerogatives of the Québec people and the Québec State was to ensure that, even absent a referendum, Quebec's political fate could result only from decisions made by Quebecers and not by other Canadians. The constitutional validity of both Clarity Act and the Act respecting the exercise of the fundamental rights and prerogatives of the Québec people and the Québec State has been questioned, however, with respect to the Constitution Act 1867's allocation of legislative powers between the federal and provincial government.

This law has no short title.

Legal Challenge to Bill 99

In August 2007, three justices of the Quebec Court of Appeal unanimously held that Keith Henderson, former Leader of the English-language rights group, the Equality Party, has standing to challenge the legality of the statute, which Quebec Superior Court has dubbed Bill 99 in the absence of a "short title" for this particular statute.^[1]

Henderson's lawyer, Brent Tyler declared that the Quebec government, which is contesting Henderson's standing to sue re Bill 99, can apply to the Supreme Court of Canada for permission to appeal from this week's Quebec Court of Appeal decision. However, Tyler did not anticipate that such an appeal would be authorized.^[1]