Jump to content

Talk:Library binding

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.158.61.140 (talk) at 17:29, 19 October 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLibraries Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Perhaps someone could start a subsection of Library Binding that discusses the impact of digitization projects on the binding of print materials.

Really?

This article states: "However, library bound books also benefit library patrons because they ensure that the volume in hand is complete, as well as to make the volumes easier to open and photocopy." If you've ever tried to photocopy an article from volume of "library bound" magazines, you know this just ain't true. It is almost impossible to get the book to open fully so that the first 1/2" or 1" nearest the spine doesn't disappear into a murky gray fog or smeared text.