Talk:Adversarial collaboration
Appearance
Does not make sense: "adversarial collaboration is a scientific experiment". Definitely not. An adversarial collaboration may lead to an experiment, but it is not a type of experiment. pgr94 (talk) 11:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Or perhaps you could say "an adversarial collaboration experiment is..." The article is also in need of some good sources or it will get nominated for deletion. pgr94 (talk) 12:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Note that the creator of the article seems to have an unhealthy interest in discrediting subjects of nonconsensual human experimentation.[1] One might speculate that he is trying to link charlatans of the sort James Randi has made a name for himself going after[2] to people who are actually experiencing mind-invasive technologies. Only time will tell.Jeremystalked(law 296) 00:25, 1 December 2010 (UTC)